clone/codex
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openai/codex.git synced 2026-04-24 14:45:27 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tasks(25): reopen and add user thinking snippet

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Rai (Michael Pokorny)
2025-06-24 22:59:00 -07:00
parent 15b895e362
commit 23cb831893
1 changed files with 30 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
agentydragon/tasks/25-guard-tool-output-sequencing-rust.md
View File

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
+++
id = "25"
title = "Guard Against Missing Tool Output in Rust Server Sequencing"
status = "Done"
status = "Reopened"
dependencies = "" # No prerequisites
last_updated = "2025-06-25T01:40:09.600000"
last_updated = "2025-06-25T22:50:01.000000"
+++
## Summary
@@ -35,5 +35,33 @@ We will implement the following high-level plan:
## Notes
```text
█
thinking █Deciding on file management █
───╮
I’m thinking that since file editing can be a hassle, it might be simpler to just remove the file. I could then ask the user to provide │any errors they’re facing. To do this, I'd create a patch to delete the specified file. Alternatively, I could consider reverting the │
changes with git, but applying the patch seems like a straightforward solution. So, I’ll go ahead and prepare to apply the patch to ──╯
delete the file.
proposed patch
D /Users/mpokorny/code/codex/agentydragon/tasks/.worktrees/23-interactive-container-command-affordance/codex-rs/.cargo/config.toml ny
ERROR: Turn interrupted
user
why did you try to delete that? s P
event
BackgroundEvent(BackgroundEventEvent { message: "stream error: unexpected status 400 Bad Request: {\n \"error\": {\n \"message\": \"No tool output found for local shell call call_PjdhYGAM7q52HL13WF8slGn9.\",\n \"type\": \"invalid_request_error\",\n \"param\":
\"input\",\n \"code\": null\n }\n}; retrying 1/10 in 201ms…" }) │
│
event │
BackgroundEvent(BackgroundEventEvent { message: "stream error: unexpected status 400 Bad Request: {\n \"error\": {\n \"message\": │
\"No tool output found for local shell call call_PjdhYGAM7q52HL13WF8slGn9.\",\n \"type\": \"invalid_request_error\",\n \"param\": │\"input\",\n \"code\": null\n }\n}; retrying 2/10 in 246ms…" }) │
│
event │BackgroundEvent(BackgroundEventEvent { message: "stream error: unexpected status 400 Bad Request: {\n \"error\": {\n \"message\": │
\"No tool output found for local shell call call_PjdhYGAM7q52HL13WF8slGn9.\",\n \"type\": \"invalid_request_error\",\n \"param\": █
\"input\",\n \"code\": null\n }\n}; retrying 3/10 in 371ms…" }) █
this is a lot of the problem still happening
```
- Mirror the JS implementation guard patterns for consistency across backends.
- Provide clear logging at the debug level to trace sequencing steps during development.