mirror of
https://github.com/openai/codex.git
synced 2026-04-25 07:05:38 +00:00
Add usage-based business plan types (#15934)
## Summary - add `self_serve_business_usage_based` and `enterprise_cbp_usage_based` to the public/internal plan enums and regenerate the app-server + Python SDK artifacts - map both plans through JWT login and backend rate-limit payloads, then bucket them with the existing Team/Business entitlement behavior in cloud requirements, usage-limit copy, tooltips, and status display - keep the earlier display-label remap commit on this branch so the new Team-like and Business-like plans render consistently in the UI ## Testing - `just write-app-server-schema` - `uv run --project sdk/python python sdk/python/scripts/update_sdk_artifacts.py generate-types` - `just fix -p codex-protocol -p codex-login -p codex-core -p codex-backend-client -p codex-cloud-requirements -p codex-tui -p codex-tui-app-server -p codex-backend-openapi-models` - `just fmt` - `just argument-comment-lint` - `cargo test -p codex-protocol usage_based_plan_types_use_expected_wire_names` - `cargo test -p codex-login usage_based` - `cargo test -p codex-backend-client usage_based` - `cargo test -p codex-cloud-requirements usage_based` - `cargo test -p codex-core usage_limit_reached_error_formats_` - `cargo test -p codex-tui plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels` - `cargo test -p codex-tui remapped` - `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server plan_type_display_name_remaps_display_labels` - `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server remapped` - `cargo test -p codex-tui-app-server preserves_usage_based_plan_type_wire_name` ## Notes - a broader multi-crate `cargo test` run still hits unrelated existing guardian-approval config failures in `codex-rs/core/src/config/config_tests.rs`
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6317,7 +6317,9 @@
|
||||
"plus",
|
||||
"pro",
|
||||
"team",
|
||||
"self_serve_business_usage_based",
|
||||
"business",
|
||||
"enterprise_cbp_usage_based",
|
||||
"enterprise",
|
||||
"edu",
|
||||
"unknown"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user