Chore: add cmd related info to exec approval request (#9659)

### Summary
We now rely purely on `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` item to
render pending approval in VSCE and app. With v2 approach, it does not
include the actual cmd that it is attempting and therefore we can only
use `proposedExecpolicyAmendment` to render which can be incomplete.

### Reproduce
* Add `prefix_rule(pattern=["echo"], decision="prompt")` to your
`~/.codex/rules.default.rules`.
* Ask to `Run  echo "approval-test" please` in VSCE or app. 
* The pending approval protal does show up but with no content

#### Example screenshot
<img width="3434" height="3648" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-21 at 8 23
25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/75644837-21f1-40f8-8b02-858d361ff817"
/>

#### Sample output
```
  {"method":"item/commandExecution/requestApproval","id":0,"params":{
    "threadId":"019be439-5a90-7600-a7ea-2d2dcc50302a",
    "turnId":"0",
    "itemId":"call_usgnQ4qEX5U9roNdjT7fPzhb",
    "reason":"`/bin/zsh -lc 'echo \"testing\"'` requires approval by policy",
    "proposedExecpolicyAmendment":null
  }}

```

### Fix
Inlude `command` string, `cwd` and `command_actions` in
`CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams` so that consumers can display
the correct command instead of relying on exec policy output.
This commit is contained in:
Shijie Rao
2026-01-21 23:58:53 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 079fd2adb9
commit a4cb97ba5a
4 changed files with 30 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ Certain actions (shell commands or modifying files) may require explicit user ap
Order of messages:
1. `item/started` — shows the pending `commandExecution` item with `command`, `cwd`, and other fields so you can render the proposed action.
2. `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` (request) — carries the same `itemId`, `threadId`, `turnId`, optionally `reason` or `risk`, plus `parsedCmd` for friendly display.
2. `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` (request) — carries the same `itemId`, `threadId`, `turnId`, optionally `reason`, plus `command`, `cwd`, and `commandActions` for friendly display.
3. Client response — `{ "decision": "accept", "acceptSettings": { "forSession": false } }` or `{ "decision": "decline" }`.
4. `item/completed` — final `commandExecution` item with `status: "completed" | "failed" | "declined"` and execution output. Render this as the authoritative result.