fix(guardian): fix ordering of guardian events (#16462)

Guardian events were emitted a bit out of order for CommandExecution
items. This would make it hard for the frontend to render a guardian
auto-review, which has this payload:
```
pub struct ItemGuardianApprovalReviewStartedNotification {
    pub thread_id: String,
    pub turn_id: String,
    pub target_item_id: String,
    pub review: GuardianApprovalReview,
    // FYI this is no longer a json blob
    pub action: Option<JsonValue>,
}
```

There is a `target_item_id` the auto-approval review is referring to,
but the actual item had not been emitted yet.

Before this PR:
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`, and if approved...
- `item/started`
- `item/completed`

After this PR:
- `item/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`
- `item/completed`

This lines up much better with existing patterns (i.e. human review in
`Default mode`, where app-server would send a server request to prompt
for user approval after `item/started`), and makes it easier for clients
to render what guardian is actually reviewing.

We do this following a similar pattern as `FileChange` (aka apply patch)
items, where we create a FileChange item and emit `item/started` if we
see the apply patch approval request, before the actual apply patch call
runs.
This commit is contained in:
Owen Lin
2026-04-06 12:14:27 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 4eabc3dcb1
commit bd30bad96f
8 changed files with 1084 additions and 321 deletions

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
// Exposes protocol pieces used by `lib.rs` via `pub use protocol::common::*;`.
pub mod common;
pub mod item_builders;
mod mappers;
mod serde_helpers;
pub mod thread_history;