CXC-392
[With
401](https://openai.sentry.io/issues/7333870443/?project=4510195390611458&query=019ce8f8-560c-7f10-a00a-c59553740674&referrer=issue-stream)
<img width="1909" height="555" alt="401 auth tags in Sentry"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/412ea950-61c4-4780-9697-15c270971ee3"
/>
- auth_401_*: preserved facts from the latest unauthorized response snapshot
- auth_*: latest auth-related facts from the latest request attempt
- auth_recovery_*: unauthorized recovery state and follow-up result
Without 401
<img width="1917" height="522" alt="happy-path auth tags in Sentry"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3381ed28-8022-43b0-b6c0-623a630e679f"
/>
###### Summary
- Add client-visible 401 diagnostics for auth attachment, upstream auth classification, and 401 request id / cf-ray correlation.
- Record unauthorized recovery mode, phase, outcome, and retry/follow-up status without changing auth behavior.
- Surface the highest-signal auth and recovery fields on uploaded client bug reports so they are usable in Sentry.
- Preserve original unauthorized evidence under `auth_401_*` while keeping follow-up result tags separate.
###### Rationale (from spec findings)
- The dominant bucket needed proof of whether the client attached auth before send or upstream still classified the request as missing auth.
- Client uploads needed to show whether unauthorized recovery ran and what the client tried next.
- Request id and cf-ray needed to be preserved on the unauthorized response so server-side correlation is immediate.
- The bug-report path needed the same auth evidence as the request telemetry path, otherwise the observability would not be operationally useful.
###### Scope
- Add auth 401 and unauthorized-recovery observability in `codex-rs/core`, `codex-rs/codex-api`, and `codex-rs/otel`, including feedback-tag surfacing.
- Keep auth semantics, refresh behavior, retry behavior, endpoint classification, and geo-denial follow-up work out of this PR.
###### Trade-offs
- This exports only safe auth evidence: header presence/name, upstream auth classification, request ids, and recovery state. It does not export token values or raw upstream bodies.
- This keeps websocket connection reuse as a transport clue because it can help distinguish stale reused sessions from fresh reconnects.
- Misroute/base-url classification and geo-denial are intentionally deferred to a separate follow-up PR so this review stays focused on the dominant auth 401 bucket.
###### Client follow-up
- PR 2 will add misroute/provider and geo-denial observability plus the matching feedback-tag surfacing.
- A separate host/app-server PR should log auth-decision inputs so pre-send host auth state can be correlated with client request evidence.
- `device_id` remains intentionally separate until there is a safe existing source on the feedback upload path.
###### Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core refresh_available_models_sorts_by_priority`
- `cargo test -p codex-core emit_feedback_request_tags_`
- `cargo test -p codex-core emit_feedback_auth_recovery_tags_`
- `cargo test -p codex-core auth_request_telemetry_context_tracks_attached_auth_and_retry_phase`
- `cargo test -p codex-core extract_response_debug_context_decodes_identity_headers`
- `cargo test -p codex-core identity_auth_details`
- `cargo test -p codex-core telemetry_error_messages_preserve_non_http_details`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --all-features --no-run`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_api_request_auth_observability`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_websocket_connect_auth_observability`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel otel_export_routing_policy_routes_websocket_request_transport_observability`
## Why
PR #13783 moved the `codex.rs` unit tests into `codex_tests.rs`. This
applies the same extraction pattern across the rest of `codex-rs/core`
so the production modules stay focused on runtime code instead of large
inline test blocks.
Keeping the tests in sibling files also makes follow-up edits easier to
review because product changes no longer have to share a file with
hundreds or thousands of lines of test scaffolding.
## What changed
- replaced each inline `mod tests { ... }` in `codex-rs/core/src/**`
with a path-based module declaration
- moved each extracted unit test module into a sibling `*_tests.rs`
file, using `mod_tests.rs` for `mod.rs` modules
- preserved the existing `cfg(...)` guards and module-local structure so
the refactor remains structural rather than behavioral
## Testing
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib` (`1653 passed; 0 failed; 5 ignored`)
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `cargo fmt --check`
- `cargo shear`
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
Added multi-limit support end-to-end by carrying limit_name in
rate-limit snapshots and handling multiple buckets instead of only
codex.
Extended /usage client parsing to consume additional_rate_limits
Updated TUI /status and in-memory state to store/render per-limit
snapshots
Extended app-server rate-limit read response: kept rate_limits and added
rate_limits_by_name.
Adjusted usage-limit error messaging for non-default codex limit buckets
###### Problem
Users get generic 429s with no guidance when a model is at capacity.
###### Solution
Detect model-cap headers, surface a clear “try a different model”
message, and keep behavior non‑intrusive (no auto‑switch).
###### Scope
CLI/TUI only; protocol + error mapping updated to carry model‑cap info.
###### Tests
- just fmt
- cargo test -p codex-tui
- cargo test -p codex-core --lib
shell_snapshot::tests::try_new_creates_and_deletes_snapshot_file --
--nocapture (ran in isolated env)
- validate local build with backend
<img width="719" height="845" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1470b33d-0974-4b1f-b8e6-d11f892f4b54"
/>
**Goal**: Prevent response.failed events with `invalid_prompt` from
being treated as retryable errors so the UI shows the actual error
message instead of continually retrying.
**Before**: Codex would continue to retry despite the prompt being
marked as disallowed
**After**: Codex will stop retrying once prompt is marked disallowed
Historically we started with a CodexAuth that knew how to refresh it's
own tokens and then added AuthManager that did a different kind of
refresh (re-reading from disk).
I don't think it makes sense for both `CodexAuth` and `AuthManager` to
be mutable and contain behaviors.
Move all refresh logic into `AuthManager` and keep `CodexAuth` as a data
object.
If an image can't be read by the API, it will poison the entire history,
preventing any new turn on the conversation.
This detect such cases and replace the image by a placeholder
