# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
## Summary
- add `skill_approval` to `RejectConfig` and the app-server v2
`AskForApproval::Reject` payload so skill-script prompts can be
configured independently from sandbox and rule-based prompts
- update Unix shell escalation to reject prompts based on the actual
decision source, keeping prefix rules tied to `rules`, unmatched command
fallbacks tied to `sandbox_approval`, and skill scripts tied to
`skill_approval`
- regenerate the affected protocol/config schemas and expand
unit/integration coverage for the new flag and skill approval behavior
Summary
- drop `McpToolOutput` in favor of `CallToolResult`, moving its helpers
to keep MCP tooling focused on the final result shape
- wire the new schema definitions through code mode, context, handlers,
and spec modules so MCP tools serialize the exact output shape expected
by the model
- extend code mode tests to cover multiple MCP call scenarios and ensure
the serialized data matches the new schema
- refresh JS runner helpers and protocol models alongside the schema
changes
Testing
- Not run (not requested)
### Purpose
While trying to build out CLI-Tools for the agent to use under skills we
have found that those tools sometimes need to invoke a user elicitation.
These elicitations are handled out of band of the codex app-server but
need to indicate to the exec manager that the command running is not
going to progress on the usual timeout horizon.
### Example
Model calls universal exec:
`$ download-credit-card-history --start-date 2026-01-19 --end-date
2026-02-19 > credit_history.jsonl`
download-cred-card-history might hit a hosted/preauthenticated service
to fetch data. That service might decide that the request requires an
end user approval the access to the personal data. It should be able to
signal to the running thread that the command in question is blocked on
user elicitation. In that case we want the exec to continue, but the
timeout to not expire on the tool call, essentially freezing time until
the user approves or rejects the command at which point the tool would
signal the app-server to decrement the outstanding elicitation count.
Now timeouts would proceed as normal.
### What's Added
- New v2 RPC methods:
- thread/increment_elicitation
- thread/decrement_elicitation
- Protocol updates in:
- codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/common.rs
- codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2.rs
- App-server handlers wired in:
- codex-rs/app-server/src/codex_message_processor.rs
### Behavior
- Counter starts at 0 per thread.
- increment atomically increases the counter.
- decrement atomically decreases the counter; decrement at 0 returns
invalid request.
- Transition rules:
- 0 -> 1: broadcast pause state, pausing all active stopwatches
immediately.
- \>0 -> >0: remain paused.
- 1 -> 0: broadcast unpause state, resuming stopwatches.
- Core thread/session logic:
- codex-rs/core/src/codex_thread.rs
- codex-rs/core/src/codex.rs
- codex-rs/core/src/mcp_connection_manager.rs
### Exec-server stopwatch integration
- Added centralized stopwatch tracking/controller:
- codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/stopwatch_controller.rs
- Hooked pause/unpause broadcast handling + stopwatch registration:
- codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/mcp.rs
- codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix/stopwatch.rs
- codex-rs/exec-server/src/posix.rs
(Experimental)
This PR adds a first MVP for hooks, with SessionStart and Stop
The core design is:
- hooks live in a dedicated engine under codex-rs/hooks
- each hook type has its own event-specific file
- hook execution is synchronous and blocks normal turn progression while
running
- matching hooks run in parallel, then their results are aggregated into
a normalized HookRunSummary
On the AppServer side, hooks are exposed as operational metadata rather
than transcript-native items:
- new live notifications: hook/started, hook/completed
- persisted/replayed hook results live on Turn.hookRuns
- we intentionally did not add hook-specific ThreadItem variants
Hooks messages are not persisted, they remain ephemeral. The context
changes they add are (they get appended to the user's prompt)
## Summary
This is a fast follow to the initial `[permissions]` structure.
- keep the new split-policy carveout behavior for narrower non-write
entries under broader writable roots
- preserve legacy `WorkspaceWrite` semantics by using a cwd-aware bridge
that drops only redundant nested readable roots when projecting from
`SandboxPolicy`
- route the legacy macOS seatbelt adapter through that same legacy
bridge so redundant nested readable roots do not become read-only
carveouts on macOS
- derive the legacy bridge for `command_exec` using the sandbox root cwd
rather than the request cwd so policy derivation matches later sandbox
enforcement
- add regression coverage for the legacy macOS nested-readable-root case
## Examples
### Legacy `workspace-write` on macOS
A legacy `workspace-write` policy can redundantly list a nested readable
root under an already-writable workspace root.
For example, legacy config can effectively mean:
- workspace root (`.` / `cwd`) is writable
- `docs/` is also listed in `readable_roots`
The new shared split-policy helper intentionally treats a narrower
non-write entry under a broader writable root as a carveout for real
`[permissions]` configs. Without this fast follow, the unchanged macOS
seatbelt legacy adapter could project that legacy shape into a
`FileSystemSandboxPolicy` that treated `docs/` like a read-only carveout
under the writable workspace root. In practice, legacy callers on macOS
could unexpectedly lose write access inside `docs/`, even though that
path was writable before the `[permissions]` migration work.
This change fixes that by routing the legacy seatbelt path through the
cwd-aware legacy bridge, so:
- legacy `workspace-write` keeps `docs/` writable when `docs/` was only
a redundant readable root
- explicit `[permissions]` entries like `'.' = 'write'` and `'docs' =
'read'` still make `docs/` read-only, which is the new intended
split-policy behavior
### Legacy `command_exec` with a subdirectory cwd
`command_exec` can run a command from a request cwd that is narrower
than the sandbox root cwd.
For example:
- sandbox root cwd is `/repo`
- request cwd is `/repo/subdir`
- legacy policy is still `workspace-write` rooted at `/repo`
Before this fast follow, `command_exec` derived the legacy bridge using
the request cwd, but the sandbox was later built using the sandbox root
cwd. That mismatch could miss redundant legacy readable roots during
projection and accidentally reintroduce read-only carveouts for paths
that should still be writable under the legacy model.
This change fixes that by deriving the legacy bridge with the same
sandbox root cwd that sandbox enforcement later uses.
## Verification
- `just fmt`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
seatbelt_legacy_workspace_write_nested_readable_root_stays_writable`
- `cargo test -p codex-core test_sandbox_config_parsing`
- `cargo clippy -p codex-core -p codex-app-server --all-targets -- -D
warnings`
- `cargo clean`
## Summary
We need to support allowing request_permissions calls when using
`Reject` policy
<img width="1133" height="588" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 12 06
40 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8df987f-c225-4866-b8ab-5590960daec5"
/>
Note that this is a backwards-incompatible change for Reject policy. I'm
not sure if we need to add a default based on our current use/setup
## Testing
- [x] Added tests
- [x] Tested locally
## Summary
request_permissions flows should support persisting results for the
session.
Open Question: Still deciding if we need within-turn approvals - this
adds complexity but I could see it being useful
## Testing
- [x] Updated unit tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Adds a built-in `request_permissions` tool and wires it through the
Codex core, protocol, and app-server layers so a running turn can ask
the client for additional permissions instead of relying on a static
session policy.
The new flow emits a `RequestPermissions` event from core, tracks the
pending request by call ID, forwards it through app-server v2 as an
`item/permissions/requestApproval` request, and resumes the tool call
once the client returns an approved subset of the requested permission
profile.
## Summary
- add the guardian reviewer flow for `on-request` approvals in command,
patch, sandbox-retry, and managed-network approval paths
- keep guardian behind `features.guardian_approval` instead of exposing
a public `approval_policy = guardian` mode
- route ordinary `OnRequest` approvals to the guardian subagent when the
feature is enabled, without changing the public approval-mode surface
## Public model
- public approval modes stay unchanged
- guardian is enabled via `features.guardian_approval`
- when that feature is on, `approval_policy = on-request` keeps the same
approval boundaries but sends those approval requests to the guardian
reviewer instead of the user
- `/experimental` only persists the feature flag; it does not rewrite
`approval_policy`
- CLI and app-server no longer expose a separate `guardian` approval
mode in this PR
## Guardian reviewer
- the reviewer runs as a normal subagent and reuses the existing
subagent/thread machinery
- it is locked to a read-only sandbox and `approval_policy = never`
- it does not inherit user/project exec-policy rules
- it prefers `gpt-5.4` when the current provider exposes it, otherwise
falls back to the parent turn's active model
- it fail-closes on timeout, startup failure, malformed output, or any
other review error
- it currently auto-approves only when `risk_score < 80`
## Review context and policy
- guardian mirrors `OnRequest` approval semantics rather than
introducing a separate approval policy
- explicit `require_escalated` requests follow the same approval surface
as `OnRequest`; the difference is only who reviews them
- managed-network allowlist misses that enter the approval flow are also
reviewed by guardian
- the review prompt includes bounded recent transcript history plus
recent tool call/result evidence
- transcript entries and planned-action strings are truncated with
explicit `<guardian_truncated ... />` markers so large payloads stay
bounded
- apply-patch reviews include the full patch content (without
duplicating the structured `changes` payload)
- the guardian request layout is snapshot-tested using the same
model-visible Responses request formatter used elsewhere in core
## Guardian network behavior
- the guardian subagent inherits the parent session's managed-network
allowlist when one exists, so it can use the same approved network
surface while reviewing
- exact session-scoped network approvals are copied into the guardian
session with protocol/port scope preserved
- those copied approvals are now seeded before the guardian's first turn
is submitted, so inherited approvals are available during any immediate
review-time checks
## Out of scope / follow-ups
- the sandbox-permission validation split was pulled into a separate PR
and is not part of this diff
- a future follow-up can enable `serde_json` preserve-order in
`codex-core` and then simplify the guardian action rendering further
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why
`#13434` introduces split `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` and
`NetworkSandboxPolicy`, but the runtime still made most execution-time
sandbox decisions from the legacy `SandboxPolicy` projection.
That projection loses information about combinations like unrestricted
filesystem access with restricted network access. In practice, that
means the runtime can choose the wrong platform sandbox behavior or set
the wrong network-restriction environment for a command even when config
has already separated those concerns.
This PR carries the split policies through the runtime so sandbox
selection, process spawning, and exec handling can consult the policy
that actually matters.
## What changed
- threaded `FileSystemSandboxPolicy` and `NetworkSandboxPolicy` through
`TurnContext`, `ExecRequest`, sandbox attempts, shell escalation state,
unified exec, and app-server exec overrides
- updated sandbox selection in `core/src/sandboxing/mod.rs` and
`core/src/exec.rs` to key off `FileSystemSandboxPolicy.kind` plus
`NetworkSandboxPolicy`, rather than inferring behavior only from the
legacy `SandboxPolicy`
- updated process spawning in `core/src/spawn.rs` and the platform
wrappers to use `NetworkSandboxPolicy` when deciding whether to set
`CODEX_SANDBOX_NETWORK_DISABLED`
- kept additional-permissions handling and legacy `ExternalSandbox`
compatibility projections aligned with the split policies, including
explicit user-shell execution and Windows restricted-token routing
- updated callers across `core`, `app-server`, and `linux-sandbox` to
pass the split policies explicitly
## Verification
- added regression coverage in `core/tests/suite/user_shell_cmd.rs` to
verify `RunUserShellCommand` does not inherit
`CODEX_SANDBOX_NETWORK_DISABLED` from the active turn
- added coverage in `core/src/exec.rs` for Windows restricted-token
sandbox selection when the legacy projection is `ExternalSandbox`
- updated Linux sandbox coverage in
`linux-sandbox/tests/suite/landlock.rs` to exercise the split-policy
exec path
- verified the current PR state with `just clippy`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/13439).
* #13453
* #13452
* #13451
* #13449
* #13448
* #13445
* #13440
* __->__ #13439
---------
Co-authored-by: viyatb-oai <viyatb@openai.com>
## Summary
This is a purely mechanical refactor of `OtelManager` ->
`SessionTelemetry` to better convey what the struct is doing. No
behavior change.
## Why
`OtelManager` ended up sounding much broader than what this type
actually does. It doesn't manage OTEL globally; it's the session-scoped
telemetry surface for emitting log/trace events and recording metrics
with consistent session metadata (`app_version`, `model`, `slug`,
`originator`, etc.).
`SessionTelemetry` is a more accurate name, and updating the call sites
makes that boundary a lot easier to follow.
## Validation
- `just fmt`
- `cargo test -p codex-otel`
- `cargo test -p codex-core`
