Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Bolin
13e0ec1614 permissions: make legacy profile conversion cwd-free (#19414)
## Why

The profile conversion path still required a `cwd` even when it was only
translating a legacy `SandboxPolicy` into a `PermissionProfile`. That
made profile producers invent an ambient `cwd`, which is exactly the
anchoring we are trying to remove from permission-profile data. A legacy
workspace-write policy can be represented symbolically instead: `:cwd =
write` plus read-only `:project_roots` metadata subpaths.

This PR creates that cwd-free base so the rest of the stack can stop
threading cwd through profile construction. Callers that actually need a
concrete runtime filesystem policy for a specific cwd still have an
explicitly named cwd-bound conversion.

## What Changed

- `PermissionProfile::from_legacy_sandbox_policy` now takes only
`&SandboxPolicy`.
- `FileSystemSandboxPolicy::from_legacy_sandbox_policy` is now the
symbolic, cwd-free projection for profiles.
- The old concrete projection is retained as
`FileSystemSandboxPolicy::from_legacy_sandbox_policy_for_cwd` for
runtime/boundary code that must materialize legacy cwd behavior.
- Workspace-write profiles preserve `CurrentWorkingDirectory` and
`ProjectRoots` special entries instead of materializing cwd into
absolute paths.

## Verification

- `cargo check -p codex-protocol -p codex-core -p
codex-app-server-protocol -p codex-app-server -p codex-exec -p
codex-exec-server -p codex-tui -p codex-sandboxing -p
codex-linux-sandbox -p codex-analytics --tests`
- `just fix -p codex-protocol -p codex-core -p codex-app-server-protocol
-p codex-app-server -p codex-exec -p codex-exec-server -p codex-tui -p
codex-sandboxing -p codex-linux-sandbox -p codex-analytics`




---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19414).
* #19395
* #19394
* #19393
* #19392
* #19391
* __->__ #19414
2026-04-24 13:42:05 -07:00
Michael Bolin
4816b89204 permissions: make profiles represent enforcement (#19231)
## Why

`PermissionProfile` is becoming the canonical permissions abstraction,
but the old shape only carried optional filesystem and network fields.
It could describe allowed access, but not who is responsible for
enforcing it. That made `DangerFullAccess` and `ExternalSandbox` lossy
when profiles were exported, cached, or round-tripped through app-server
APIs.

The important model change is that active permissions are now a disjoint
union over the enforcement mode. Conceptually:

```rust
pub enum PermissionProfile {
    Managed {
        file_system: FileSystemSandboxPolicy,
        network: NetworkSandboxPolicy,
    },
    Disabled,
    External {
        network: NetworkSandboxPolicy,
    },
}
```

This distinction matters because `Disabled` means Codex should apply no
outer sandbox at all, while `External` means filesystem isolation is
owned by an outside caller. Those are not equivalent to a broad managed
sandbox. For example, macOS cannot nest Seatbelt inside Seatbelt, so an
inner sandbox may require the outer Codex layer to use no sandbox rather
than a permissive one.

## How Existing Modeling Maps

Legacy `SandboxPolicy` remains a boundary projection, but it now maps
into the higher-fidelity profile model:

- `ReadOnly` and `WorkspaceWrite` map to `PermissionProfile::Managed`
with restricted filesystem entries plus the corresponding network
policy.
- `DangerFullAccess` maps to `PermissionProfile::Disabled`, preserving
the “no outer sandbox” intent instead of treating it as a lax managed
sandbox.
- `ExternalSandbox { network_access }` maps to
`PermissionProfile::External { network }`, preserving external
filesystem enforcement while still carrying the active network policy.
- Split runtime policies that legacy `SandboxPolicy` cannot faithfully
express, such as managed unrestricted filesystem plus restricted
network, stay `Managed` instead of being collapsed into
`ExternalSandbox`.
- Per-command/session/turn grants remain partial overlays via
`AdditionalPermissionProfile`; full `PermissionProfile` is reserved for
complete active runtime permissions.

## What Changed

- Change active `PermissionProfile` into a tagged union: `managed`,
`disabled`, and `external`.
- Keep partial permission grants separate with
`AdditionalPermissionProfile` for command/session/turn overlays.
- Represent managed filesystem permissions as either `restricted`
entries or `unrestricted`; `glob_scan_max_depth` is non-zero when
present.
- Preserve old rollout compatibility by accepting the pre-tagged `{
network, file_system }` profile shape during deserialization.
- Preserve fidelity for important edge cases: `DangerFullAccess`
round-trips as `disabled`, `ExternalSandbox` round-trips as `external`,
and managed unrestricted filesystem + restricted network stays managed
instead of being mistaken for external enforcement.
- Preserve configured deny-read entries and bounded glob scan depth when
full profiles are projected back into runtime policies, including
unrestricted replacements that now become `:root = write` plus deny
entries.
- Regenerate the experimental app-server v2 JSON/TypeScript schema and
update the `command/exec` README example for the tagged
`permissionProfile` shape.

## Compatibility

Legacy `SandboxPolicy` remains available at config/API boundaries as the
compatibility projection. Existing rollout lines with the old
`PermissionProfile` shape continue to load. The app-server
`permissionProfile` field is experimental, so its v2 wire shape is
intentionally updated to match the higher-fidelity model.

## Verification

- `just write-app-server-schema`
- `cargo check --tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol permission_profile`
- `cargo test -p codex-protocol
preserving_deny_entries_keeps_unrestricted_policy_enforceable`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol
permission_profile_file_system_permissions`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol serialize_client_response`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
session_configured_reports_permission_profile_for_external_sandbox`
- `just fix`
- `just fix -p codex-protocol`
- `just fix -p codex-app-server-protocol`
- `just fix -p codex-core`
- `just fix -p codex-app-server`
2026-04-23 23:02:18 -07:00
Michael Bolin
44dbd9e48a exec-server: require explicit filesystem sandbox cwd (#19046)
## Why

This is a cleanup PR for the `PermissionProfile` migration stack. #19016
fixed remote exec-server sandbox contexts so Docker-backed filesystem
requests use a request/container `cwd` instead of leaking the local test
runner `cwd`. That exposed the broader API problem:
`FileSystemSandboxContext::new(SandboxPolicy)` could still reconstruct
filesystem permissions by reading the exec-server process cwd with
`AbsolutePathBuf::current_dir()`.

That made `cwd`-dependent legacy entries, such as `:cwd`,
`:project_roots`, and relative deny globs, depend on ambient process
state instead of the request sandbox `cwd`. As later PRs make
`PermissionProfile` the primary permissions abstraction, sandbox
contexts should be explicit about whether they carry a request `cwd` or
are profile-only. Removing the implicit constructor prevents new call
sites from accidentally rebuilding permissions against the wrong `cwd`.

## What changed

- Removed `FileSystemSandboxContext::new(SandboxPolicy)`.
- Kept production callers on explicit constructors:
`from_legacy_sandbox_policy(..., cwd)`, `from_permission_profile(...)`,
and `from_permission_profile_with_cwd(...)`.
- Updated exec-server test helpers to construct `PermissionProfile`
values directly instead of routing through legacy `SandboxPolicy`
projections.
- Updated the environment regression test to use an explicit restricted
profile with no synthetic `cwd`.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server`
- `just fix -p codex-exec-server`


---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19046).
* #18288
* #18287
* #18286
* #18285
* #18284
* #18283
* #18282
* #18281
* #18280
* __->__ #19046
2026-04-22 23:05:12 +00:00
Michael Bolin
d3dd0d759b exec-server: expose arg0 alias root to fs sandbox (#19016)
## Why

The post-merge `rust-ci-full` run for #18999 still failed the Ubuntu
remote `suite::remote_env` sandboxed filesystem tests. That run checked
out merge commit `ddde50c611e4800cb805f243ed3c50bbafe7d011`, so the arg0
guard lifetime fix was present.

The Docker-backed failure had two remaining pieces:

- The sandboxed filesystem helper needs to execute Codex through the
`codex-linux-sandbox` arg0 alias path. The helper sandbox was only
granting read access to the real Codex executable parent, so the alias
parent also has to be visible inside the helper sandbox.
- The remote-env tests were building sandbox contexts with
`FileSystemSandboxContext::new()`, which captures the local test runner
cwd. In the Docker remote exec-server, that host checkout path does not
exist, so spawning the filesystem helper failed with `No such file or
directory` before the helper could process the request.

## What Changed

- Track all helper runtime read roots instead of a single root.
- Add both the real Codex executable parent and the
`codex-linux-sandbox` alias parent to sandbox readable roots.
- Avoid sending an unused local cwd in remote filesystem sandbox
contexts when the permission profile has no cwd-dependent entries.
- Build the Docker remote-env test sandbox contexts with a cwd path that
exists inside the container.
- Add unit coverage for the alias-parent root and remote sandbox cwd
handling.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
remote_test_env_sandboxed_read_allows_readable_root`
- `just fix -p codex-exec-server`
- `just fix -p codex-core`
2026-04-22 21:34:22 +00:00
Michael Bolin
36f8bb4ffa exec-server: carry filesystem sandbox profiles (#18276)
## Why

The exec-server still needs platform sandbox inputs, but the migration
should preserve the `PermissionProfile` that produced them. Keeping only
the derived legacy sandbox map would keep `SandboxPolicy` as the
effective abstraction and would make full-disk vs. restricted profiles
harder to preserve as the permissions stack starts round-tripping
profiles.

`PermissionProfile` entries can also be cwd-sensitive (`:cwd`,
`:project_roots`, relative globs), so the exec-server must carry the
request sandbox cwd instead of resolving those entries against the
long-lived exec-server process cwd.

## What changed

`FileSystemSandboxContext` now carries `permissions: PermissionProfile`
plus an optional `cwd`:

- removed `sandboxPolicy`, `sandboxPolicyCwd`,
`fileSystemSandboxPolicy`, and `additionalPermissions`
- added `permissions` and `cwd`
- kept the platform knobs `windowsSandboxLevel`,
`windowsSandboxPrivateDesktop`, and `useLegacyLandlock`

Core turn and apply-patch paths populate the context from the active
runtime permissions and request cwd. Exec-server derives platform
`SandboxPolicy`/`FileSystemSandboxPolicy` at the filesystem boundary,
adds helper runtime reads there, and rejects cwd-dependent profiles that
arrive without a cwd.

The legacy `FileSystemSandboxContext::new(SandboxPolicy)` constructor
now preserves the old workspace-write conversion semantics for
compatibility tests/callers.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server sandbox_cwd -- --nocapture`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server
sandbox_context_new_preserves_legacy_workspace_write_read_only_subpaths
-- --nocapture`
- `cargo test -p codex-core --lib
file_system_sandbox_context_uses_active_attempt -- --nocapture`
2026-04-21 20:22:28 -07:00
viyatb-oai
f705f42ba8 fix: fix fs sandbox helper for apply_patch (#18296)
## Summary

- pass split filesystem sandbox policy/cwd through apply_patch contexts,
while omitting legacy-equivalent policies to keep payloads small
- keep the fs helper compatible with legacy Landlock by avoiding helper
read-root permission expansion in that mode and disabling helper network
access

## Root Cause

`d626dc38950fb40a1a5ad0a8ffab2485e3348c53` routed exec-server filesystem
operations through a sandboxed helper. That path forwarded legacy
Landlock into a helper policy shape that could require direct
split-policy enforcement. Sandboxed `apply_patch` hit that edge through
the filesystem abstraction.

The same 0.121 edit-regression path is consistent with #18354: normal
writes route through the `apply_patch` filesystem helper, fail under
sandbox, and then surface the generic retry-without-sandbox prompt.

Fixes #18069
Fixes #18354

## Validation

- `cd codex-rs && just fmt`
- earlier branch validation before merging current `origin/main` and
dropping the now-separate PATH fix:
  - `cd codex-rs && cargo test -p codex-exec-server`
- `cd codex-rs && cargo test -p codex-core file_system_sandbox_context`
  - `cd codex-rs && just fix -p codex-exec-server`
  - `cd codex-rs && just fix -p codex-core`
  - `git diff --check`
  - `cd codex-rs && cargo clean`

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-04-17 15:39:07 -07:00
pakrym-oai
f3cbe3d385 [codex] Add symlink flag to fs metadata (#17719)
Add `is_symlink` to FsMetadata struct.
2026-04-13 17:46:56 -07:00
starr-openai
d626dc3895 Run exec-server fs operations through sandbox helper (#17294)
## Summary
- run exec-server filesystem RPCs requiring sandboxing through a
`codex-fs` arg0 helper over stdin/stdout
- keep direct local filesystem execution for `DangerFullAccess` and
external sandbox policies
- remove the standalone exec-server binary path in favor of top-level
arg0 dispatch/runtime paths
- add sandbox escape regression coverage for local and remote filesystem
paths

## Validation
- `just fmt`
- `git diff --check`
- remote devbox: `cd codex-rs && bazel test --bes_backend=
--bes_results_url= //codex-rs/exec-server:all` (6/6 passed)

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-04-12 18:36:03 -07:00
starr-openai
f383cc980d Add sandbox support to filesystem APIs (#16751)
## Summary
- add optional `sandboxPolicy` support to the app-server filesystem
request surface
- thread sandbox-aware filesystem options through app-server and
exec-server adapters
- enforce sandboxed read/write access in the filesystem abstraction with
focused local and remote coverage

## Validation
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec-server file_system`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server suite::v2::fs`

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-04-08 12:10:48 -07:00
pakrym-oai
e9702411ab [codex] Migrate apply_patch to executor filesystem (#17027)
- Migrate apply-patch verification and application internals to use the
async `ExecutorFileSystem` abstraction from `exec-server`.
- Convert apply-patch `cwd` handling to `AbsolutePathBuf` through the
verifier/parser/handler boundary.

Doesn't change how the tool itself works.
2026-04-07 21:20:22 +00:00
pakrym-oai
403b397e4e Refactor ExecServer filesystem split between local and remote (#15232)
For each feature we have:
1. Trait exposed on environment
2. **Local Implementation** of the trait
3. Remote implementation that uses the client to proxy via network
4. Handler implementation that handles PRC requests and calls into
**Local Implementation**
2026-03-19 17:08:04 -07:00