Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
pash-openai
dc1a8f2190 [tool search] support namespaced deferred dynamic tools (#18413)
Deferred dynamic tools need to round-trip a namespace so a tool returned
by `tool_search` can be called through the same registry key that core
uses for dispatch.

This change adds namespace support for dynamic tool specs/calls,
persists it through app-server thread state, and routes dynamic tool
calls by full `ToolName` while still sending the app the leaf tool name.
Deferred dynamic tools must provide a namespace; non-deferred dynamic
tools may remain top-level.

It also introduces `LoadableToolSpec` as the shared
function-or-namespace Responses shape used by both `tool_search` output
and dynamic tool registration, so dynamic tools use the same wrapping
logic in both paths.

Validation:
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tool_search`

---------

Co-authored-by: Sayan Sisodiya <sayan@openai.com>
2026-04-21 14:13:08 +08:00
sayan-oai
9c6d038622 [code mode] defer mcp tools from exec description (#17287)
## Summary
- hide deferred MCP/app nested tool descriptions from the `exec` prompt
in code mode
- add short guidance that omitted nested tools are still available
through `ALL_TOOLS`
- cover the code_mode_only path with an integration test that discovers
and calls a deferred app tool

## Motivation
`code_mode_only` exposes only top-level `exec`/`wait`, but the `exec`
description could still include a large nested-tool reference. This
keeps deferred nested tools callable while avoiding that prompt bloat.

## Tests
- `just fmt`
- `just fix -p codex-code-mode`
- `just fix -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-code-mode
exec_description_mentions_deferred_nested_tools_when_available`
- `cargo test -p codex-tools
create_code_mode_tool_matches_expected_spec`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
code_mode_only_guides_all_tools_search_and_calls_deferred_app_tools`
2026-04-17 00:01:14 +08:00
sayan-oai
0df7e9a820 register all mcp tools with namespace (#17404)
stacked on #17402.

MCP tools returned by `tool_search` (deferred tools) get registered in
our `ToolRegistry` with a different format than directly available
tools. this leads to two different ways of accessing MCP tools from our
tool catalog, only one of which works for each. fix this by registering
all MCP tools with the namespace format, since this info is already
available.

also, direct MCP tools are registered to responsesapi without a
namespace, while deferred MCP tools have a namespace. this means we can
receive MCP `FunctionCall`s in both formats from namespaces. fix this by
always registering MCP tools with namespace, regardless of deferral
status.

make code mode track `ToolName` provenance of tools so it can map the
literal JS function name string to the correct `ToolName` for
invocation, rather than supporting both in core.

this lets us unify to a single canonical `ToolName` representation for
each MCP tool and force everywhere to use that one, without supporting
fallbacks.
2026-04-15 21:02:59 +08:00
Vivian Fang
7bbe3b6011 Add output_schema to code mode render (#17210)
This updates code-mode tool rendering so MCP tools can surface
structured output types from their `outputSchema`.

What changed:
- Detect MCP tool-call result wrappers from the output schema shape
instead of relying on tool-name parsing or provenance flags.
- Render shared TypeScript aliases once for MCP tool results
(`CallToolResult`, `ContentBlock`, etc.) so multiple MCP tool
declarations stay compact.
- Type `structuredContent` from the tool definition's `outputSchema`
instead of rendering it as `unknown`.
- Update the shared MCP aliases to match the MCP draft `CallToolResult`
schema more closely.

Example:
- Before: `declare const tools: { mcp__rmcp__echo(args: { env_var?:
string; message: string; }): Promise<{ _meta?: unknown; content:
Array<unknown>; isError?: boolean; structuredContent?: unknown; }>; };`
- After: `declare const tools: { mcp__rmcp__echo(args: { env_var?:
string; message: string; }): Promise<CallToolResult<{ echo: string; env:
string | null; }>>; };`
2026-04-10 11:41:44 +00:00
Vivian Fang
d47b755aa2 Render namespace description for tools (#16879) 2026-04-08 02:39:40 -07:00
Vivian Fang
ea516f9a40 Support anyOf and enum in JsonSchema (#16875)
This brings us into better alignment with the JSON schema subset that is
supported in
<https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/structured-outputs#supported-schemas>,
and also allows us to render richer function signatures in code mode
(e.g., anyOf{null, OtherObjectType})
2026-04-08 01:07:55 -07:00
Michael Bolin
9f71d57a65 Extract code-mode nested tool collection into codex-tools (#16509)
## Why
This is another small step in the `codex-core` -> `codex-tools`
migration described in `AGENTS.md`.

`core/src/tools/spec.rs` and `core/src/tools/code_mode/mod.rs` were both
hand-rolling the same pure transformation: convert visible `ToolSpec`s
into code-mode nested tool definitions, then sort and deduplicate by
tool name. That logic does not depend on core runtime state or handlers,
so keeping it in `codex-core` makes `spec.rs` harder to peel out later
than it needs to be.

## What Changed
- Add `collect_code_mode_tool_definitions()` to
`codex-rs/tools/src/code_mode.rs`.
- Reuse that helper from `codex-rs/core/src/tools/spec.rs` when
assembling the `exec` tool description.
- Reuse the same helper from `codex-rs/core/src/tools/code_mode/mod.rs`
when exposing nested tool metadata to the code-mode runtime.

This is intended to be a straight refactor with no behavior change and
no new test surface.

## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core tools::spec::tests`
- `cargo test -p codex-core code_mode_only_`
2026-04-01 22:17:55 -07:00
Michael Bolin
af568afdd5 codex-tools: extract utility tool specs (#16154)
## Why

The previous `codex-tools` migration steps moved the shared schema
models, local-host specs, collaboration specs, and related adapters out
of `codex-core`, but `core/src/tools/spec.rs` still contained a grab bag
of pure utility tool builders. Those specs do not need session state or
handler logic; they only describe wire shapes for tools that
`codex-core` already knows how to execute.

Moving that remaining low-coupling layer into `codex-tools` keeps the
migration moving in meaningful chunks and trims another large block of
passive tool-spec construction out of `codex-core` without touching the
runtime-coupled handlers.

## What changed

- extended `codex-tools` to own the pure spec builders for:
  - code-mode `exec` / `wait`
  - `js_repl` / `js_repl_reset`
- MCP resource tools `list_mcp_resources`,
`list_mcp_resource_templates`, and `read_mcp_resource`
  - utility tools `list_dir` and `test_sync_tool`
- split those builders across small module files with sibling
`*_tests.rs` coverage, keeping `src/lib.rs` exports-only
- rewired `core/src/tools/spec.rs` to call the extracted builders and
deleted the duplicated core-local implementations
- moved the direct JS REPL grammar seam test out of
`core/src/tools/spec_tests.rs` so it now lives with the extracted
implementation in `codex-tools`
- updated `codex-rs/tools/README.md` so the documented crate boundary
matches the new utility-spec surface

## Test plan

- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex-tools-utility-specs cargo test -p
codex-tools`
- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex-core-utility-specs cargo test -p
codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
- `just fix -p codex-tools -p codex-core`
- `just argument-comment-lint`

## References

- #15923
- #15928
- #15944
- #15953
- #16031
- #16047
- #16129
- #16132
- #16138
- #16141
2026-03-29 14:34:36 -07:00
Michael Bolin
2238c16a91 codex-tools: extract code mode tool spec adapters (#16132)
## Why

The longer-term `codex-tools` migration is to move pure tool-definition
and tool-spec plumbing out of `codex-core` while leaving session- and
runtime-coupled orchestration behind.

The remaining code-mode adapter layer in
`core/src/tools/code_mode_description.rs` was a good next extraction
seam because it only transformed `ToolSpec` values for code mode and
already delegated the low-level description rendering to
`codex-code-mode`.

## What Changed

- added `codex-rs/tools/src/code_mode.rs` with
`augment_tool_spec_for_code_mode()` and
`tool_spec_to_code_mode_tool_definition()`
- added focused unit coverage in `codex-rs/tools/src/code_mode_tests.rs`
- rewired `core/src/tools/spec.rs` and `core/src/tools/code_mode/mod.rs`
to use the extracted adapters from `codex-tools`
- removed the old `core/src/tools/code_mode_description.rs` shim and its
test file from `codex-core`
- added the `codex-code-mode` dependency to `codex-tools`, updated
`Cargo.lock`, and refreshed the `codex-tools` README to reflect the
expanded boundary

## Test Plan

- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex-core-code-mode-adapters cargo test -p
codex-core --lib tools::spec::`
- `CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/codex-core-code-mode-adapters cargo test -p
codex-core --lib tools::code_mode::`
- `just bazel-lock-update`
- `just bazel-lock-check`
- `just argument-comment-lint`

## References

- #15923
- #15928
- #15944
- #15953
- #16031
- #16047
- #16129
2026-03-28 15:32:35 -07:00