## Summary
- Add `TimedOut` to Guardian/review carrier types:
- `ReviewDecision::TimedOut`
- `GuardianAssessmentStatus::TimedOut`
- app-server v2 `GuardianApprovalReviewStatus::TimedOut`
- Regenerate app-server JSON/TypeScript schemas for the new wire shape.
- Wire the new status through core/app-server/TUI mappings with
conservative fail-closed handling.
- Keep `TimedOut` non-user-selectable in the approval UI.
**Does not change runtime behavior yet; emitting `TimeOut` and
parent-model timeout messaging will come in followup PRs**
## Description
This PR introduces `review_id` as the stable identifier for guardian
reviews and exposes it in app-server `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
and `item/autoApprovalReview/completed` events.
Internally, guardian rejection state is now keyed by `review_id` instead
of the reviewed tool item ID. `target_item_id` is still included when a
review maps to a concrete thread item, but it is no longer overloaded as
the review lifecycle identifier.
## Motivation
We'd like to give users the ability to preempt a guardian review while
it's running (approve or decline).
However, we can't implement the API that allows the user to override a
running guardian review because we didn't have a unique `review_id` per
guardian review. Using `target_item_id` is not correct since:
- with execve reviews, there can be multiple execve calls (and therefore
guardian reviews) per shell command
- with network policy reviews, there is no target item ID
The PR that actually implements user overrides will use `review_id` as
the stable identifier.
Guardian events were emitted a bit out of order for CommandExecution
items. This would make it hard for the frontend to render a guardian
auto-review, which has this payload:
```
pub struct ItemGuardianApprovalReviewStartedNotification {
pub thread_id: String,
pub turn_id: String,
pub target_item_id: String,
pub review: GuardianApprovalReview,
// FYI this is no longer a json blob
pub action: Option<JsonValue>,
}
```
There is a `target_item_id` the auto-approval review is referring to,
but the actual item had not been emitted yet.
Before this PR:
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`, and if approved...
- `item/started`
- `item/completed`
After this PR:
- `item/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/started`
- `item/autoApprovalReview/completed`
- `item/completed`
This lines up much better with existing patterns (i.e. human review in
`Default mode`, where app-server would send a server request to prompt
for user approval after `item/started`), and makes it easier for clients
to render what guardian is actually reviewing.
We do this following a similar pattern as `FileChange` (aka apply patch)
items, where we create a FileChange item and emit `item/started` if we
see the apply patch approval request, before the actual apply patch call
runs.
