mirror of https://github.com/openai/codex.git synced 2026-05-19 18:52:57 +00:00

Files

Celia Chen 4dbca61e20 fix: default unknown tool schemas to empty schemas (#22380 )

## Why

Some tool providers, especially MCP servers and dynamic tool sources,
can supply schema nodes that omit `type` and have no recognized JSON
Schema shape hints. Previously, `sanitize_json_schema` filled those
unknown nodes in as `string`, which made the schema parseable but
invented a scalar constraint that the provider did not specify. For
description-only fields, that could incorrectly steer tool arguments
away from the provider's actual accepted shape.

The Responses API accepts permissive empty schemas such as `{}` at
nested property positions, so Codex should preserve that permissive
meaning instead of coercing unknown schema nodes into a misleading
scalar type.

## What Changed

- Changed the no-hints fallback in `codex-rs/tools/src/json_schema.rs`
to clear unrecognized object schema nodes to `{}`.
- Empty schemas now remain `{}` rather than becoming `type: "string"`.
- Description-only or otherwise metadata-only nested property schemas
now become `{}` while surrounding object/array/string/number inference
still applies when recognized hints are present.
- Updated `codex-tools` and `codex-core` tests to cover top-level empty
schemas, nested empty schemas, metadata-only malformed schemas, dynamic
tools, and MCP tool specs.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-tools`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
test_mcp_tool_property_missing_type_defaults_to_empty_schema`
- Manually verified the real Responses API behavior for both
empty-schema positions:
- Top-level function `parameters: {}` is accepted and echoed back as
`{"type":"object","properties":{}}`; when forced to call the tool,
Responses emitted empty object arguments: `"arguments": "{}"`.
- Nested property schema `{}` is accepted and preserved as `{}`; when
forced to call a tool with `metadata.extra`, Responses emitted
`"arguments": "{\"metadata\":{\"extra\":\"codex schema sanitizer
behavior\"}}"`.

2026-05-18 12:41:10 -07:00

src

fix: default unknown tool schemas to empty schemas (#22380 )

2026-05-18 12:41:10 -07:00

BUILD.bazel

[codex] Move tool specs into core handlers (#21416 )

2026-05-06 15:40:50 -07:00

Cargo.toml

feat: make ToolExecutor an async trait (#22560 )

2026-05-14 11:23:57 +02:00

README.md

Refactor extension tools onto shared ToolExecutor (#22369 )

2026-05-13 12:12:06 +02:00

README.md

codex-tools

codex-tools is the shared support crate for building, adapting, planning, and executing model-visible tool sets outside codex-core.

Today this crate owns the host-facing tool models and helpers that no longer need to live in core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:

aggregate host models such as ToolSpec, ConfiguredToolSpec, LoadableToolSpec, ResponsesApiNamespace, and ResponsesApiNamespaceTool
host config and discovery models used while assembling tool sets, including ToolsConfig, discoverable-tool models, and request-plugin-install helpers
host adapters such as schema sanitization, MCP/dynamic conversion, code-mode augmentation, and image-detail normalization
shared executable-tool contracts such as ToolExecutor, ToolCall, and ToolOutput

That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding boundaries are ready.

Vision

Over time, this crate should hold host-side tool machinery that is shared by multiple consumers, for example:

host-visible aggregate tool models
tool-set planning and discovery helpers
MCP and dynamic-tool adaptation into Responses API shapes
code-mode compatibility shims that do not depend on codex-core
other narrowly scoped host utilities that multiple crates need

The corresponding non-goals are just as important:

do not move codex-core orchestration here prematurely
do not pull Session / TurnContext / approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces
do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code

Migration approach

The expected migration shape is:

Keep extension-owned executable-tool authoring in codex-extension-api.
Move host-side planning/adaptation helpers here when they no longer need to stay coupled to codex-core.
Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in codex-core while downstream call sites are updated.
Only extract higher-level host infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.

Crate conventions

This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it stays easy to grow:

src/lib.rs should remain exports-only.
Business logic should live in named module files such as foo.rs.
Unit tests for foo.rs should live in a sibling foo_tests.rs.
The implementation file should wire tests with:

#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;

If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding more here.