mirror of https://github.com/openai/codex.git synced 2026-05-28 15:00:16 +00:00

Files

sayan-oai a22706dfae standalone websearch extension (#23823 )

## Summary

Add the extension-backed standalone `web.run` tool so Codex can call the
standalone search endpoint through the `codex-api` search client and
return its encrypted output to Responses.

- gate the new tool behind `standalone_web_search`
- install the extension in the app-server thread registry and hide
hosted `web_search` when standalone search is enabled for OpenAI
providers so the two paths stay mutually exclusive
- build search context from persisted history using a small tail
heuristic: previous user message, assistant text between the last two
user turns capped at about 1k tokens, and current user message

## Test Plan

- `cargo test -p codex-web-search-extension`
- `cargo test -p codex-api`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
hosted_tools_follow_provider_auth_model_and_config_gates`

2026-05-26 11:12:24 -07:00

src

standalone websearch extension (#23823 )

2026-05-26 11:12:24 -07:00

tests

chore: add JSON schema policy fixture coverage (#24152 )

2026-05-22 16:31:33 -07:00

BUILD.bazel

[codex] Move tool specs into core handlers (#21416 )

2026-05-06 15:40:50 -07:00

Cargo.toml

chore: add JSON schema policy fixture coverage (#24152 )

2026-05-22 16:31:33 -07:00

README.md

Remove ToolsConfig from tool planning (#22835 )

2026-05-19 11:24:09 +02:00

README.md

codex-tools

codex-tools is the shared support crate for building, adapting, and executing model-visible tools outside codex-core.

Today this crate owns the host-facing tool models and helpers that no longer need to live in core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:

aggregate host models such as ToolSpec, ConfiguredToolSpec, LoadableToolSpec, ResponsesApiNamespace, and ResponsesApiNamespaceTool
host discovery models used while assembling tool sets, including discoverable-tool models and request-plugin-install helpers
host adapters such as schema sanitization, MCP/dynamic conversion, code-mode augmentation, and image-detail normalization
shared executable-tool contracts such as ToolExecutor, ToolCall, and ToolOutput

That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding boundaries are ready.

Vision

Over time, this crate should hold host-side tool machinery that is shared by multiple consumers, for example:

host-visible aggregate tool models
tool-set planning and discovery helpers
MCP and dynamic-tool adaptation into Responses API shapes
code-mode compatibility shims that do not depend on codex-core
other narrowly scoped host utilities that multiple crates need

The corresponding non-goals are just as important:

do not move codex-core orchestration here prematurely
do not pull Session / TurnContext / approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces
do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code

Migration approach

The expected migration shape is:

Keep extension-owned executable-tool authoring in codex-extension-api.
Move host-side planning/adaptation helpers here when they no longer need to stay coupled to codex-core.
Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in codex-core while downstream call sites are updated.
Only extract higher-level host infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.

Crate conventions

This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it stays easy to grow:

src/lib.rs should remain exports-only.
Business logic should live in named module files such as foo.rs.
Unit tests for foo.rs should live in a sibling foo_tests.rs.
The implementation file should wire tests with:

#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;

If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding more here.