Files
codex/codex-rs/core
Abhinav 8494e5bd7b Add PermissionRequest hooks support (#17563)
## Why

We need `PermissionRequest` hook support!

Also addresses:
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/16301
- run a script on Hook to do things like play a sound to draw attention
but actually no-op so user can still approve
- can omit the `decision` object from output or just have the script
exit 0 and print nothing
- https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/15311
  - let the script approve/deny on its own
  - external UI what will run on Hook and relay decision back to codex


## Reviewer Note

There's a lot of plumbing for the new hook, key files to review are:
- New hook added in `codex-rs/hooks/src/events/permission_request.rs`
- Wiring for network approvals
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/network_approval.rs`
- Wiring for tool orchestrator `codex-rs/core/src/tools/orchestrator.rs`
- Wiring for execve
`codex-rs/core/src/tools/runtimes/shell/unix_escalation.rs`

## What

- Wires shell, unified exec, and network approval prompts into the
`PermissionRequest` hook flow.
- Lets hooks allow or deny approval prompts; quiet or invalid hooks fall
back to the normal approval path.
- Uses `tool_input.description` for user-facing context when it helps:
  - shell / `exec_command`: the request justification, when present
  - network approvals: `network-access <domain>`
- Uses `tool_name: Bash` for shell, unified exec, and network approval
permission-request hooks.
- For network approvals, passes the originating command in
`tool_input.command` when there is a single owning call; otherwise falls
back to the synthetic `network-access ...` command.

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for a shell
approval</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "rm -f /tmp/example"
  }
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for an escalated
`exec_command` request</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "cp /tmp/source.json /Users/alice/export/source.json",
    "description": "Need to copy a generated file outside the workspace"
  }
}
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>Example `PermissionRequest` hook input for a network
approval</summary>

```json
{
  "session_id": "<session-id>",
  "turn_id": "<turn-id>",
  "transcript_path": "/path/to/transcript.jsonl",
  "cwd": "/path/to/cwd",
  "hook_event_name": "PermissionRequest",
  "model": "gpt-5",
  "permission_mode": "default",
  "tool_name": "Bash",
  "tool_input": {
    "command": "curl http://codex-network-test.invalid",
    "description": "network-access http://codex-network-test.invalid"
  }
}
```

</details>

## Follow-ups

- Implement the `PermissionRequest` semantics for `updatedInput`,
`updatedPermissions`, `interrupt`, and suggestions /
`permission_suggestions`
- Add `PermissionRequest` support for the `request_permissions` tool
path

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-04-17 14:45:47 +00:00
..

codex-core

This crate implements the business logic for Codex. It is designed to be used by the various Codex UIs written in Rust.

Dependencies

Note that codex-core makes some assumptions about certain helper utilities being available in the environment. Currently, this support matrix is:

macOS

Expects /usr/bin/sandbox-exec to be present.

When using the workspace-write sandbox policy, the Seatbelt profile allows writes under the configured writable roots while keeping .git (directory or pointer file), the resolved gitdir: target, and .codex read-only.

Network access and filesystem read/write roots are controlled by SandboxPolicy. Seatbelt consumes the resolved policy and enforces it.

Seatbelt also keeps the legacy default preferences read access (user-preference-read) needed for cfprefs-backed macOS behavior.

Linux

Expects the binary containing codex-core to run the equivalent of codex sandbox linux (legacy alias: codex debug landlock) when arg0 is codex-linux-sandbox. See the codex-arg0 crate for details.

Legacy SandboxPolicy / sandbox_mode configs are still supported on Linux. They can continue to use the legacy Landlock path when the split filesystem policy is sandbox-equivalent to the legacy model after cwd resolution. Split filesystem policies that need direct FileSystemSandboxPolicy enforcement, such as read-only or denied carveouts under a broader writable root, automatically route through bubblewrap. The legacy Landlock path is used only when the split filesystem policy round-trips through the legacy SandboxPolicy model without changing semantics. That includes overlapping cases like /repo = write, /repo/a = none, /repo/a/b = write, where the more specific writable child must reopen under a denied parent.

The Linux sandbox helper prefers the first bwrap found on PATH outside the current working directory whenever it is available. If bwrap is present but too old to support --argv0, the helper keeps using system bubblewrap and switches to a no---argv0 compatibility path for the inner re-exec. If bwrap is missing, it falls back to the vendored bubblewrap path compiled into the binary and Codex surfaces a startup warning through its normal notification path instead of printing directly from the sandbox helper. Codex also surfaces a startup warning when bubblewrap cannot create user namespaces. WSL2 uses the normal Linux bubblewrap path. WSL1 is not supported for bubblewrap sandboxing because it cannot create the required user namespaces, so Codex rejects sandboxed shell commands that would enter the bubblewrap path before invoking bwrap.

Windows

Legacy SandboxPolicy / sandbox_mode configs are still supported on Windows.

The elevated setup/runner backend supports legacy ReadOnlyAccess::Restricted for read-only and workspace-write policies. Restricted read access honors explicit readable roots plus the command cwd, and keeps writable roots readable when workspace-write is used.

When include_platform_defaults = true, the elevated Windows backend adds backend-managed system read roots required for basic execution, such as C:\Windows, C:\Program Files, C:\Program Files (x86), and C:\ProgramData. When it is false, those extra system roots are omitted.

The elevated Windows sandbox also supports:

  • legacy ReadOnly and WorkspaceWrite behavior
  • split filesystem policies that need exact readable roots, exact writable roots, or extra read-only carveouts under writable roots

The unelevated restricted-token backend still supports the legacy full-read Windows model for legacy ReadOnly and WorkspaceWrite behavior. It also supports a narrow split-filesystem subset: full-read split policies whose writable roots still match the legacy WorkspaceWrite root set, but add extra read-only carveouts under those writable roots.

New [permissions] / split filesystem policies remain supported on Windows only when they can be enforced directly by the selected Windows backend or round-trip through the legacy SandboxPolicy model without changing semantics. Policies that would require direct explicit unreadable carveouts (none) or reopened writable descendants under read-only carveouts still fail closed instead of running with weaker enforcement.

All Platforms

Expects the binary containing codex-core to simulate the virtual apply_patch CLI when arg1 is --codex-run-as-apply-patch. See the codex-arg0 crate for details.