## Summary Wires rollout trace recording into `codex-core` session and turn execution. This records the core model request/response, compaction, and session lifecycle boundaries needed for replay without yet tracing every nested runtime/tool boundary. ## Stack This is PR 2/5 in the rollout trace stack. - [#18876](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18876): Add rollout trace crate - [#18877](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18877): Record core session rollout traces - [#18878](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18878): Trace tool and code-mode boundaries - [#18879](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18879): Trace sessions and multi-agent edges - [#18880](https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/18880): Add debug trace reduction command ## Review Notes This layer is the first live integration point. The important review question is whether trace recording is isolated from normal session behavior: trace failures should not become user-visible execution failures, and recording should preserve the existing turn/session lifecycle semantics. The PR depends on the reducer/data model from the first stack entry and only introduces the core recorder surface that later PRs use for richer runtime and relationship events.
Rollout Trace
Privacy: Rollout tracing does not collect, upload, or report user data; it only writes local bundles when
CODEX_ROLLOUT_TRACE_ROOTis set.
Rollout tracing is an opt-in diagnostic path for understanding what happened during a Codex session. It records raw runtime evidence into a local bundle, then replays that bundle into a semantic graph that a debugger or UI can inspect.
The key design choice is: observe first, interpret later.
Hot-path Codex code does not try to build the final graph while the session is running. It writes ordered raw events and payload references. The offline reducer then decides which events became model-visible conversation, which events were runtime work, and how information moved between threads, tools, code cells, and terminal sessions.
What This Gives Us
Rollout traces make failures debuggable when the normal transcript is not enough. They preserve enough evidence to answer questions like:
- Which model request produced this tool call?
- Did this output come from the model-visible transcript, a code-mode runtime value, a terminal operation, or an agent notification?
- Which code-mode
execcell issued a nested tool call? - Which terminal operation created or reused a running process?
- Which multi-agent v2 tool call spawned, messaged, received from, or closed a child thread?
The reduced state.json is intentionally not just a transcript. It is a graph of
model-visible conversation plus the runtime objects that explain how Codex got
there.
System Shape
flowchart TD
subgraph Runtime["codex-core runtime"]
Protocol["protocol lifecycle\nthread start/end, turn start/end"]
Inference["inference + compaction\nrequests, responses, checkpoints"]
Tools["tool dispatch\ndirect model tools + code-mode nested tools"]
CodeMode["code-mode runtime\nexec cells, yields, waits, termination"]
Terminal["terminal runtime\nexec_command / write_stdin operations"]
Agents["multi_agent_v2\nspawn, task delivery, result, close"]
end
Recorder["RolloutTraceRecorder\nthin best-effort producer"]
Writer["TraceWriter\nassigns seq and writes payloads before events"]
subgraph Bundle["trace bundle"]
Manifest["manifest.json\ntrace_id, rollout_id, root_thread_id"]
Events["trace.jsonl\nordered raw event spine"]
Payloads["payloads/*.json\nlarge raw evidence"]
end
Reducer["replay_bundle\ndeterministic offline reducer"]
subgraph State["state.json"]
Threads["threads + turns"]
Conversation["conversation_items\nwhat the model saw"]
RuntimeObjects["inference_calls, tool_calls,\ncode_cells, terminals, compactions"]
Edges["interaction_edges\nspawn, task, result, close"]
RawRefs["raw_payload refs"]
end
Protocol --> Recorder
Inference --> Recorder
Tools --> Recorder
CodeMode --> Recorder
Terminal --> Recorder
Agents --> Recorder
Recorder --> Writer
Writer --> Manifest
Writer --> Payloads
Writer --> Events
Manifest --> Reducer
Events --> Reducer
Payloads --> Reducer
Reducer --> Threads
Reducer --> Conversation
Reducer --> RuntimeObjects
Reducer --> Edges
Reducer --> RawRefs
The recorder is deliberately small. It is enabled by CODEX_ROLLOUT_TRACE_ROOT
and must never make a Codex session fail just because tracing failed. Core emits
raw observations; this crate owns the bundle schema, writer API, and reducer.
Bundle Layout
A trace bundle contains:
manifest.json: trace identity and bundle metadata.trace.jsonl: append-only raw events ordered by writer-assignedseq.payloads/*.json: raw requests, responses, tool inputs/results, runtime events, terminal output, compaction data, and protocol snapshots.state.json: optional reducer output written bycodex debug trace-reduce.
trace_id identifies this diagnostic artifact. rollout_id identifies the
Codex rollout/session being observed. Keeping those separate lets us reason about
the stored trace without confusing it with the product-level session identity.
To reduce a bundle:
codex debug trace-reduce <trace-bundle>
By default this writes <trace-bundle>/state.json.
Raw Evidence vs Reduced Graph
flowchart LR
Model["model-visible payloads\nrequests and response output items"]
Runtime["runtime observations\ntool dispatch, terminal output, code-mode JSON"]
RawPayloads["payloads/*.json\nexact evidence"]
Reducer["reducer"]
Conversation["ConversationItem\nwhat the model saw"]
ToolCall["ToolCall\nruntime tool boundary"]
CodeCell["CodeCell\nmodel-authored exec cell"]
TerminalOperation["TerminalOperation\ncommand/write/poll"]
InteractionEdge["InteractionEdge\ninformation flow"]
Model --> RawPayloads
Runtime --> RawPayloads
RawPayloads --> Reducer
Reducer --> Conversation
Reducer --> ToolCall
Reducer --> CodeCell
Reducer --> TerminalOperation
Reducer --> InteractionEdge
CodeCell --> ToolCall
ToolCall --> TerminalOperation
ToolCall --> InteractionEdge
Conversation --> InteractionEdge
This distinction is the reason the model has both raw payload references and
semantic objects. A code-mode nested tool call, for example, has JSON input and
output at the JavaScript runtime boundary, but the model-visible transcript only
contains the surrounding exec custom tool call and its eventual output.
The reducer keeps those facts separate:
ConversationItemrecords what appeared in model-facing requests/responses.ToolCall,CodeCell,TerminalOperation,InferenceCall, andCompactionrecord runtime/debug boundaries.InteractionEdgerecords information flow between objects, such as aspawn_agenttool call delivering a task into a child thread.RawPayloadRefpoints back to exact evidence when a viewer needs more detail than the reduced graph stores inline.
Multi-Agent v2
Multi-agent v2 child threads share the root trace writer. That means one root bundle reduces into one graph containing the parent thread, child threads, and the edges between them.
flowchart LR
RootTool["root ToolCall\nspawn_agent / followup_task / send_message"]
ChildInput["child ConversationItem\ninjected task/message"]
ChildThread["child AgentThread"]
ChildResult["child assistant ConversationItem\nresult message"]
RootNotice["root ConversationItem\nsubagent notification"]
CloseTool["root ToolCall\nclose_agent"]
TargetThread["target AgentThread"]
RootTool -- "spawn/task edge" --> ChildInput
ChildInput --> ChildThread
ChildThread --> ChildResult
ChildResult -- "agent_result edge" --> RootNotice
CloseTool -- "close_agent edge" --> TargetThread
Top-level independent threads still get independent bundles. Spawned child
threads are different: they are part of the same rollout tree, so they belong in
the same raw event log, payload directory, and reduced state.json.
Reducer Invariants
The reducer is strict where the raw evidence should be self-consistent:
- raw events are replayed in
seqorder; - payload files must exist before events refer to them;
- reduced object IDs are stable within one replay;
- runtime events may be queued until the model-visible source or delivery target has been observed;
- model-visible conversation is derived from model-facing payloads, not from runtime convenience output;
- runtime payloads are evidence, not proof that the model saw the same bytes.
Those invariants let the reduced graph stay small while preserving a path back to the original evidence whenever a debugger needs to explain why an object or edge exists.