## Why
`command/exec` is another app-server entry point that can run under
caller-provided permissions. It needs to accept `PermissionProfile`
directly so command execution is not left behind on `SandboxPolicy`
while thread APIs move forward.
Command-level profiles also need to preserve the semantics clients
expect from profile-relative paths. `:cwd` and cwd-relative deny globs
should be anchored to the resolved command cwd for a command-specific
profile, while configured deny-read restrictions such as `**/*.env =
none` still need to be enforced because they can come from config or
requirements rather than the command override itself.
## What Changed
This adds `permissionProfile` to `CommandExecParams`, rejects requests
that combine it with `sandboxPolicy`, and converts accepted profiles
into the runtime filesystem/network permissions used for command
execution.
When a command supplies a profile, the app-server resolves that profile
against the command cwd instead of the thread/server cwd. It also
preserves configured deny-read entries and `globScanMaxDepth` on the
effective filesystem policy so one-off command overrides cannot drop
those read protections. The PR also updates app-server docs/schema
fixtures and adds command-exec coverage for accepted, rejected,
cwd-scoped, and deny-read-preserving profile paths.
## Verification
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
command_exec_permission_profile_cwd_uses_command_cwd`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
command_profile_preserves_configured_deny_read_restrictions`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
command_exec_accepts_permission_profile`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server
command_exec_rejects_sandbox_policy_with_permission_profile`
- `just fix -p codex-app-server`
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/18283).
* #18288
* #18287
* #18286
* #18285
* #18284
* __->__ #18283
9d824cf4b4