5f4d0ec343
## Summary TL;DR: teaches `codex-rs` / app-server to request a desktop-provided attestation token and attach it as `x-oai-attestation` on the scoped ChatGPT Codex request paths.  ## Details This PR teaches the Codex app-server runtime how to request and attach an attestation token. It does not generate DeviceCheck tokens directly; instead, it relies on the connected desktop app to advertise that it can generate attestation and then asks that app for a fresh header value when needed. The flow is: 1. The Codex desktop app connects to app-server. 2. During `initialize`, the app can advertise that it supports `requestAttestation`. 3. Before app-server calls selected ChatGPT Codex endpoints, it sends the internal server request `attestation/generate` to the app. 4. app-server receives a pre-encoded header value back. 5. app-server forwards that value as `x-oai-attestation` on the scoped outbound requests. The code in this repo is mostly protocol and runtime plumbing: it adds the app-server request/response shape, introduces an attestation provider in core, wires that provider into Responses / compaction / realtime setup paths, and covers the intended scoping with tests. The signed macOS DeviceCheck generation remains owned by the desktop app PR. ## Related PR - Codex desktop app implementation: https://github.com/openai/openai/pull/878649 ## Validation <details> <summary>Tests run</summary> ```sh cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol cargo test -p codex-core attestation --lib cargo test -p codex-app-server --lib attestation ``` Also ran: ```sh just fix -p codex-core just fix -p codex-app-server just fix -p codex-app-server-protocol just fmt just write-app-server-schema ``` </details> <details> <summary>E2E DeviceCheck validation</summary> First validated the signed desktop app boundary directly: launched a packaged signed `Codex.app`, sent `attestation/generate`, decoded the returned `v1.` attestation header, and validated the extracted DeviceCheck token with `personal/jm/verify_devicecheck_token.py` using bundle ID `com.openai.codex`. Apple returned `status_code: 200` and `is_ok: true`. Then ran the fuller app + app-server flow. The packaged `Codex.app` launched a current-branch app-server via `CODEX_CLI_PATH`, and a local MITM proxy intercepted outbound `chatgpt.com` traffic. The app-server requested `attestation/generate` from the real Electron app process, and the intercepted `/backend-api/codex/responses` traffic included `x-oai-attestation` on both routes: ```text GET /backend-api/codex/responses Upgrade: websocket x-oai-attestation: present POST /backend-api/codex/responses Upgrade: none x-oai-attestation: present ``` The captured header decoded to a DeviceCheck token that also validated with Apple for `com.openai.codex` (`status_code: 200`, `is_ok: true`, team `2DC432GLL2`). </details> --------- Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
codex-core
This crate implements the business logic for Codex. It is designed to be used by the various Codex UIs written in Rust.
Dependencies
Note that codex-core makes some assumptions about certain helper utilities being available in the environment. Currently, this support matrix is:
macOS
Expects /usr/bin/sandbox-exec to be present.
When using the workspace-write sandbox policy, the Seatbelt profile allows
writes under the configured writable roots while keeping .git (directory or
pointer file), the resolved gitdir: target, and .codex read-only.
Network access and filesystem read/write roots are controlled by
SandboxPolicy. Seatbelt consumes the resolved policy and enforces it.
Seatbelt also keeps the legacy default preferences read access
(user-preference-read) needed for cfprefs-backed macOS behavior.
Linux
Expects the binary containing codex-core to run the equivalent of codex sandbox linux (legacy alias: codex debug landlock) when arg0 is codex-linux-sandbox. See the codex-arg0 crate for details.
Legacy SandboxPolicy / sandbox_mode configs are still supported on Linux.
They can continue to use the legacy Landlock path when the split filesystem
policy is sandbox-equivalent to the legacy model after cwd resolution.
Split filesystem policies that need direct FileSystemSandboxPolicy
enforcement, such as read-only or denied carveouts under a broader writable
root, automatically route through bubblewrap. The legacy Landlock path is used
only when the split filesystem policy round-trips through the legacy
SandboxPolicy model without changing semantics. That includes overlapping
cases like /repo = write, /repo/a = none, /repo/a/b = write, where the
more specific writable child must reopen under a denied parent.
The Linux sandbox helper prefers the first bwrap found on PATH outside the
current working directory whenever it is available. If bwrap is present but
too old to support --argv0, the helper keeps using system bubblewrap and
switches to a no---argv0 compatibility path for the inner re-exec. If
bwrap is missing, it falls back to the bundled codex-resources/bwrap
binary shipped with Codex and Codex surfaces a startup warning through its
normal notification path instead of printing directly from the sandbox helper.
Codex also surfaces a startup warning when bubblewrap cannot create user
namespaces. WSL2 uses the normal Linux bubblewrap path. WSL1 is not supported
for bubblewrap sandboxing because it cannot create the required user
namespaces, so Codex rejects sandboxed shell commands that would enter the
bubblewrap path before invoking bwrap.
Windows
Legacy SandboxPolicy / sandbox_mode configs are still supported on
Windows. Legacy read-only and workspace-write policies imply full
filesystem read access; exact readable roots are represented by split
filesystem policies instead.
The elevated Windows sandbox also supports:
- legacy
ReadOnlyandWorkspaceWritebehavior - split filesystem policies that need exact readable roots, exact writable roots, or extra read-only carveouts under writable roots
- backend-managed system read roots required for basic execution, such as
C:\Windows,C:\Program Files,C:\Program Files (x86), andC:\ProgramData, when a split filesystem policy requests platform defaults
The unelevated restricted-token backend still supports the legacy full-read
Windows model for legacy ReadOnly and WorkspaceWrite behavior. It also
supports a narrow split-filesystem subset: full-read split policies whose
writable roots still match the legacy WorkspaceWrite root set, but add extra
read-only carveouts under those writable roots.
New [permissions] / split filesystem policies remain supported on Windows
only when they can be enforced directly by the selected Windows backend or
round-trip through the legacy SandboxPolicy model without changing semantics.
Policies that would require direct explicit unreadable carveouts (none) or
reopened writable descendants under read-only carveouts still fail closed
instead of running with weaker enforcement.
All Platforms
Expects the binary containing codex-core to simulate the virtual
apply_patch CLI when arg1 is --codex-run-as-apply-patch. See the
codex-arg0 crate for details.