mirror of
https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli.git
synced 2026-06-01 19:03:42 +00:00
1444 lines
48 KiB
TypeScript
1444 lines
48 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* @license
|
|
* Copyright 2025 Google LLC
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest';
|
|
import type {
|
|
Content,
|
|
GenerateContentConfig,
|
|
Part,
|
|
GenerateContentResponse,
|
|
} from '@google/genai';
|
|
import type { ContentGenerator } from '../core/contentGenerator.js';
|
|
import {
|
|
GeminiChat,
|
|
EmptyStreamError,
|
|
StreamEventType,
|
|
type StreamEvent,
|
|
} from './geminiChat.js';
|
|
import type { Config } from '../config/config.js';
|
|
import { setSimulate429 } from '../utils/testUtils.js';
|
|
import { DEFAULT_GEMINI_FLASH_MODEL } from '../config/models.js';
|
|
import { AuthType } from './contentGenerator.js';
|
|
import { type RetryOptions } from '../utils/retry.js';
|
|
|
|
// Mock fs module to prevent actual file system operations during tests
|
|
const mockFileSystem = new Map<string, string>();
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('node:fs', () => {
|
|
const fsModule = {
|
|
mkdirSync: vi.fn(),
|
|
writeFileSync: vi.fn((path: string, data: string) => {
|
|
mockFileSystem.set(path, data);
|
|
}),
|
|
readFileSync: vi.fn((path: string) => {
|
|
if (mockFileSystem.has(path)) {
|
|
return mockFileSystem.get(path);
|
|
}
|
|
throw Object.assign(new Error('ENOENT: no such file or directory'), {
|
|
code: 'ENOENT',
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
existsSync: vi.fn((path: string) => mockFileSystem.has(path)),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
default: fsModule,
|
|
...fsModule,
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const { mockHandleFallback } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
mockHandleFallback: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Add mock for the retry utility
|
|
const { mockRetryWithBackoff } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
mockRetryWithBackoff: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../utils/retry.js', () => ({
|
|
retryWithBackoff: mockRetryWithBackoff,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../fallback/handler.js', () => ({
|
|
handleFallback: mockHandleFallback,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const { mockLogInvalidChunk, mockLogContentRetry, mockLogContentRetryFailure } =
|
|
vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
mockLogInvalidChunk: vi.fn(),
|
|
mockLogContentRetry: vi.fn(),
|
|
mockLogContentRetryFailure: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../telemetry/loggers.js', () => ({
|
|
logInvalidChunk: mockLogInvalidChunk,
|
|
logContentRetry: mockLogContentRetry,
|
|
logContentRetryFailure: mockLogContentRetryFailure,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
describe('GeminiChat', () => {
|
|
let mockContentGenerator: ContentGenerator;
|
|
let chat: GeminiChat;
|
|
let mockConfig: Config;
|
|
const config: GenerateContentConfig = {};
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockContentGenerator = {
|
|
generateContent: vi.fn(),
|
|
generateContentStream: vi.fn(),
|
|
countTokens: vi.fn(),
|
|
embedContent: vi.fn(),
|
|
batchEmbedContents: vi.fn(),
|
|
} as unknown as ContentGenerator;
|
|
|
|
mockHandleFallback.mockClear();
|
|
// Default mock implementation for tests that don't care about retry logic
|
|
mockRetryWithBackoff.mockImplementation(async (apiCall) => apiCall());
|
|
mockConfig = {
|
|
getSessionId: () => 'test-session-id',
|
|
getTelemetryLogPromptsEnabled: () => true,
|
|
getUsageStatisticsEnabled: () => true,
|
|
getDebugMode: () => false,
|
|
getContentGeneratorConfig: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
|
authType: 'oauth-personal', // Ensure this is set for fallback tests
|
|
model: 'test-model',
|
|
}),
|
|
getModel: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('gemini-pro'),
|
|
setModel: vi.fn(),
|
|
isInFallbackMode: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
|
|
getQuotaErrorOccurred: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
|
|
setQuotaErrorOccurred: vi.fn(),
|
|
flashFallbackHandler: undefined,
|
|
getProjectRoot: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('/test/project/root'),
|
|
storage: {
|
|
getProjectTempDir: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('/test/temp'),
|
|
},
|
|
getToolRegistry: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
|
getTool: vi.fn(),
|
|
}),
|
|
getContentGenerator: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(mockContentGenerator),
|
|
} as unknown as Config;
|
|
|
|
// Disable 429 simulation for tests
|
|
setSimulate429(false);
|
|
// Reset history for each test by creating a new instance
|
|
chat = new GeminiChat(mockConfig, config, []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
vi.restoreAllMocks();
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('sendMessageStream', () => {
|
|
it('should succeed if a tool call is followed by an empty part', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock a stream that contains a tool call, then an invalid (empty) part.
|
|
const streamWithToolCall = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ functionCall: { name: 'test_tool', args: {} } }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// This second chunk is invalid according to isValidResponse
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: '' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
streamWithToolCall,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action & Assert: The stream processing should complete without throwing an error
|
|
// because the presence of a tool call makes the empty final chunk acceptable.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-tool-call-empty-end',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
(async () => {
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
/* consume stream */
|
|
}
|
|
})(),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// 3. Verify history was recorded correctly
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2); // user turn + model turn
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(1); // The empty part is discarded
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.functionCall).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should fail if the stream ends with an empty part and has no finishReason', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock a stream that ends with an invalid part and has no finish reason.
|
|
const streamWithNoFinish = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Initial content...' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// This second chunk is invalid and has no finishReason, so it should fail.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: '' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
streamWithNoFinish,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action & Assert: The stream should fail because there's no finish reason.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-no-finish-empty-end',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
(async () => {
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
/* consume stream */
|
|
}
|
|
})(),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(EmptyStreamError);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should succeed if the stream ends with an invalid part but has a finishReason and contained a valid part', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock a stream that sends a valid chunk, then an invalid one, but has a finish reason.
|
|
const streamWithInvalidEnd = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Initial valid content...' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// This second chunk is invalid, but the response has a finishReason.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: '' }], // Invalid part
|
|
},
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
streamWithInvalidEnd,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action & Assert: The stream should complete without throwing an error.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-valid-then-invalid-end',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
(async () => {
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
/* consume stream */
|
|
}
|
|
})(),
|
|
).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
|
|
// 3. Verify history was recorded correctly with only the valid part.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2); // user turn + model turn
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Initial valid content...');
|
|
});
|
|
it('should not consolidate text into a part that also contains a functionCall', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock the API to stream a malformed part followed by a valid text part.
|
|
const multiChunkStream = (async function* () {
|
|
// This malformed part has both text and a functionCall.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [
|
|
{
|
|
text: 'Some text',
|
|
functionCall: { name: 'do_stuff', args: {} },
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// This valid text part should NOT be merged into the malformed one.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: ' that should not be merged.' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
multiChunkStream,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action: Send a message and consume the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-malformed-chunk',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// Consume the stream to trigger history recording.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert: Check that the final history was not incorrectly consolidated.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
|
|
// CRUCIAL ASSERTION: There should be two separate parts.
|
|
// The old, non-strict logic would incorrectly merge them, resulting in one part.
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
// Verify the contents of each part.
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Some text');
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.functionCall).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![1]!.text).toBe(' that should not be merged.');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should consolidate subsequent text chunks after receiving an empty text chunk', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock the API to return a stream where one chunk is just an empty text part.
|
|
const multiChunkStream = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{ content: { role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Hello' }] } },
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// FIX: The original test used { text: '' }, which is invalid.
|
|
// A chunk can be empty but still valid. This chunk is now removed
|
|
// as the important part is consolidating what comes after.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { role: 'model', parts: [{ text: ' World!' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
multiChunkStream,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action: Send a message and consume the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-empty-chunk-consolidation',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// Consume the stream
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert: Check that the final history was correctly consolidated.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Hello World!');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should consolidate adjacent text parts that arrive in separate stream chunks', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock the API to return a stream of multiple, adjacent text chunks.
|
|
const multiChunkStream = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{ content: { role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'This is the ' }] } },
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{ content: { role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'first part.' }] } },
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
// This function call should break the consolidation.
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ functionCall: { name: 'do_stuff', args: {} } }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'This is the second part.' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
multiChunkStream,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action: Send a message and consume the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-multi-chunk',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// Consume the stream to trigger history recording.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert: Check that the final history was correctly consolidated.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
|
|
// The history should contain the user's turn and ONE consolidated model turn.
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn.role).toBe('model');
|
|
|
|
// The model turn should have 3 distinct parts: the merged text, the function call, and the final text.
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(3);
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe('This is the first part.');
|
|
expect(modelTurn.parts![1]!.functionCall).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(modelTurn.parts![2]!.text).toBe('This is the second part.');
|
|
});
|
|
it('should preserve text parts that stream in the same chunk as a thought', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock the API to return a single chunk containing both a thought and visible text.
|
|
const mixedContentStream = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [
|
|
{ thought: 'This is a thought.' },
|
|
{ text: 'This is the visible text that should not be lost.' },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
mixedContentStream,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action: Send a message and fully consume the stream to trigger history recording.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test message' },
|
|
'prompt-id-mixed-chunk',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// This loop consumes the stream.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert: Check the final state of the history.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
|
|
// The history should contain two turns: the user's message and the model's response.
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn.role).toBe('model');
|
|
|
|
// CRUCIAL ASSERTION:
|
|
// The buggy code would fail here, resulting in parts.length being 0.
|
|
// The corrected code will pass, preserving the single visible text part.
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe(
|
|
'This is the visible text that should not be lost.',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it('should add a placeholder model turn when a tool call is followed by an empty stream response', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Setup: A history where the model has just made a function call.
|
|
const initialHistory: Content[] = [
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Find a good Italian restaurant for me.' }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [
|
|
{
|
|
functionCall: {
|
|
name: 'find_restaurant',
|
|
args: { cuisine: 'Italian' },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
chat.setHistory(initialHistory);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Mock the API to return an empty/thought-only stream.
|
|
const emptyStreamResponse = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { role: 'model', parts: [{ thought: true }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
emptyStreamResponse,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 3. Action: Send the function response back to the model and consume the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{
|
|
message: {
|
|
functionResponse: {
|
|
name: 'find_restaurant',
|
|
response: { name: 'Vesuvio' },
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
'prompt-id-stream-1',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// This loop consumes the stream to trigger the internal logic.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 4. Assert: The history should now have four valid, alternating turns.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4);
|
|
|
|
// The final turn must be the empty model placeholder.
|
|
const lastTurn = history[3]!;
|
|
expect(lastTurn.role).toBe('model');
|
|
expect(lastTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(0);
|
|
|
|
// The second-to-last turn must be the function response we sent.
|
|
const secondToLastTurn = history[2]!;
|
|
expect(secondToLastTurn.role).toBe('user');
|
|
expect(secondToLastTurn?.parts![0]!.functionResponse).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should call generateContentStream with the correct parameters', async () => {
|
|
const response = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'response' }],
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
},
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
index: 0,
|
|
safetyRatings: [],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
text: () => 'response',
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockResolvedValue(
|
|
response,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'hello' },
|
|
'prompt-id-1',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// consume stream
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
{
|
|
model: 'test-model',
|
|
contents: [
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'hello' }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
config: {},
|
|
},
|
|
'prompt-id-1',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('recordHistory', () => {
|
|
const userInput: Content = {
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'User input' }],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it('should consolidate all consecutive model turns into a single turn', () => {
|
|
const userInput: Content = {
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'User input' }],
|
|
};
|
|
// This simulates a multi-part model response with different part types.
|
|
const modelOutput: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Thinking...' }] },
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ functionCall: { name: 'do_stuff', args: {} } }],
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, modelOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
|
|
// The history should contain the user's turn and ONE consolidated model turn.
|
|
// The old code would fail here, resulting in a length of 3.
|
|
//expect(history).toBe([]);
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn.role).toBe('model');
|
|
|
|
// The consolidated turn should contain both the text part and the functionCall part.
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Thinking...');
|
|
expect(modelTurn?.parts![1]!.functionCall).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should add a placeholder model turn when a tool call is followed by an empty response', () => {
|
|
// 1. Setup: A history where the model has just made a function call.
|
|
const initialHistory: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'Initial prompt' }] },
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ functionCall: { name: 'test_tool', args: {} } }],
|
|
},
|
|
];
|
|
chat.setHistory(initialHistory);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Action: The user provides the tool's response, and the model's
|
|
// final output is empty (e.g., just a thought, which gets filtered out).
|
|
const functionResponse: Content = {
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ functionResponse: { name: 'test_tool', response: {} } }],
|
|
};
|
|
const emptyModelOutput: Content[] = [];
|
|
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(functionResponse, emptyModelOutput, [
|
|
functionResponse,
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert: The history should now have four valid, alternating turns.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4);
|
|
|
|
// The final turn must be the empty model placeholder.
|
|
const lastTurn = history[3]!;
|
|
expect(lastTurn.role).toBe('model');
|
|
expect(lastTurn?.parts?.length).toBe(0);
|
|
|
|
// The second-to-last turn must be the function response we provided.
|
|
const secondToLastTurn = history[2]!;
|
|
expect(secondToLastTurn.role).toBe('user');
|
|
expect(secondToLastTurn?.parts![0]!.functionResponse).toBeDefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should add user input and a single model output to history', () => {
|
|
const modelOutput: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Model output' }] },
|
|
];
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, modelOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(history[0]).toEqual(userInput);
|
|
expect(history[1]).toEqual(modelOutput[0]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should consolidate adjacent text parts from multiple content objects', () => {
|
|
const modelOutput: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Part 1.' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: ' Part 2.' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: ' Part 3.' }] },
|
|
];
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, modelOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(history[1]!.role).toBe('model');
|
|
expect(history[1]!.parts).toEqual([{ text: 'Part 1. Part 2. Part 3.' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should add an empty placeholder turn if modelOutput is empty', () => {
|
|
// This simulates receiving a pre-filtered, thought-only response.
|
|
const emptyModelOutput: Content[] = [];
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, emptyModelOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(history[0]).toEqual(userInput);
|
|
expect(history[1]!.role).toBe('model');
|
|
expect(history[1]!.parts).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should preserve model outputs with undefined or empty parts arrays', () => {
|
|
const malformedOutput: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Text part' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: undefined as unknown as Part[] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [] },
|
|
];
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, malformedOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4); // userInput + 3 model turns
|
|
expect(history[1]!.parts).toEqual([{ text: 'Text part' }]);
|
|
expect(history[2]!.parts).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(history[3]!.parts).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should not consolidate content with different roles', () => {
|
|
const mixedOutput: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Model 1' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'Unexpected User' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'Model 2' }] },
|
|
];
|
|
// @ts-expect-error Accessing private method for testing
|
|
chat.recordHistory(userInput, mixedOutput);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4); // userInput, model1, unexpected_user, model2
|
|
expect(history[1]).toEqual(mixedOutput[0]);
|
|
expect(history[2]).toEqual(mixedOutput[1]);
|
|
expect(history[3]).toEqual(mixedOutput[2]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
describe('addHistory', () => {
|
|
it('should add a new content item to the history', () => {
|
|
const newContent: Content = {
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'A new message' }],
|
|
};
|
|
chat.addHistory(newContent);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(history[0]).toEqual(newContent);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should add multiple items correctly', () => {
|
|
const content1: Content = {
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Message 1' }],
|
|
};
|
|
const content2: Content = {
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Message 2' }],
|
|
};
|
|
chat.addHistory(content1);
|
|
chat.addHistory(content2);
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(history[0]).toEqual(content1);
|
|
expect(history[1]).toEqual(content2);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('sendMessageStream with retries', () => {
|
|
it('should yield a RETRY event when an invalid stream is encountered', async () => {
|
|
// ARRANGE: Mock the stream to fail once, then succeed.
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// First attempt: An invalid stream with an empty text part.
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [{ content: { parts: [{ text: '' }] } }],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// Second attempt (the retry): A minimal valid stream.
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'Success' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// ACT: Send a message and collect all events from the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test' },
|
|
'prompt-id-yield-retry',
|
|
);
|
|
const events: StreamEvent[] = [];
|
|
for await (const event of stream) {
|
|
events.push(event);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ASSERT: Check that a RETRY event was present in the stream's output.
|
|
const retryEvent = events.find((e) => e.type === StreamEventType.RETRY);
|
|
|
|
expect(retryEvent).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(retryEvent?.type).toBe(StreamEventType.RETRY);
|
|
});
|
|
it('should retry on invalid content, succeed, and report metrics', async () => {
|
|
// Use mockImplementationOnce to provide a fresh, promise-wrapped generator for each attempt.
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// First call returns an invalid stream
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [{ content: { parts: [{ text: '' }] } }], // Invalid empty text part
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// Second call returns a valid stream
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'Successful response' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test' },
|
|
'prompt-id-retry-success',
|
|
);
|
|
const chunks: StreamEvent[] = [];
|
|
for await (const chunk of stream) {
|
|
chunks.push(chunk);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Assertions
|
|
expect(mockLogInvalidChunk).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
expect(mockLogContentRetry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
expect(mockLogContentRetryFailure).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Check for a retry event
|
|
expect(chunks.some((c) => c.type === StreamEventType.RETRY)).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// Check for the successful content chunk
|
|
expect(
|
|
chunks.some(
|
|
(c) =>
|
|
c.type === StreamEventType.CHUNK &&
|
|
c.value.candidates?.[0]?.content?.parts?.[0]?.text ===
|
|
'Successful response',
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// Check that history was recorded correctly once, with no duplicates.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(history[0]).toEqual({
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'test' }],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(history[1]).toEqual({
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Successful response' }],
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should fail after all retries on persistent invalid content and report metrics', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockImplementation(
|
|
async () =>
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
parts: [{ text: '' }],
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test' },
|
|
'prompt-id-retry-fail',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(async () => {
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// Must loop to trigger the internal logic that throws.
|
|
}
|
|
}).rejects.toThrow(EmptyStreamError);
|
|
|
|
// Should be called 3 times (initial + 2 retries)
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
|
|
3,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(mockLogInvalidChunk).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
|
|
expect(mockLogContentRetry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
expect(mockLogContentRetryFailure).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
|
|
// History should be clean, as if the failed turn never happened.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
it('should correctly retry and append to an existing history mid-conversation', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Setup
|
|
const initialHistory: Content[] = [
|
|
{ role: 'user', parts: [{ text: 'First question' }] },
|
|
{ role: 'model', parts: [{ text: 'First answer' }] },
|
|
];
|
|
chat.setHistory(initialHistory);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Mock the API to fail once with an empty stream, then succeed.
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [{ content: { parts: [{ text: '' }] } }],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// Second attempt succeeds
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'Second answer' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 3. Send a new message
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'Second question' },
|
|
'prompt-id-retry-existing',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// consume stream
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 4. Assert the final history and metrics
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4);
|
|
|
|
// Assert that the correct metrics were reported for one empty-stream retry
|
|
expect(mockLogContentRetry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
|
|
// Explicitly verify the structure of each part to satisfy TypeScript
|
|
const turn1 = history[0];
|
|
if (!turn1?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn1.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error('Test setup error: First turn is not a valid text part.');
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn1.parts[0].text).toBe('First question');
|
|
|
|
const turn2 = history[1];
|
|
if (!turn2?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn2.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
'Test setup error: Second turn is not a valid text part.',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn2.parts[0].text).toBe('First answer');
|
|
|
|
const turn3 = history[2];
|
|
if (!turn3?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn3.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error('Test setup error: Third turn is not a valid text part.');
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn3.parts[0].text).toBe('Second question');
|
|
|
|
const turn4 = history[3];
|
|
if (!turn4?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn4.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
'Test setup error: Fourth turn is not a valid text part.',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn4.parts[0].text).toBe('Second answer');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should retry if the model returns a completely empty stream (no chunks)', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Mock the API to return an empty stream first, then a valid one.
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(
|
|
// First call resolves to an async generator that yields nothing.
|
|
async () => (async function* () {})(),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(
|
|
// Second call returns a valid stream.
|
|
async () =>
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Successful response after empty' }],
|
|
},
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 2. Call the method and consume the stream.
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test empty stream' },
|
|
'prompt-id-empty-stream',
|
|
);
|
|
const chunks: StreamEvent[] = [];
|
|
for await (const chunk of stream) {
|
|
chunks.push(chunk);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. Assert the results.
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
expect(
|
|
chunks.some(
|
|
(c) =>
|
|
c.type === StreamEventType.CHUNK &&
|
|
c.value.candidates?.[0]?.content?.parts?.[0]?.text ===
|
|
'Successful response after empty',
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
// Explicitly verify the structure of each part to satisfy TypeScript
|
|
const turn1 = history[0];
|
|
if (!turn1?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn1.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error('Test setup error: First turn is not a valid text part.');
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn1.parts[0].text).toBe('test empty stream');
|
|
|
|
const turn2 = history[1];
|
|
if (!turn2?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn2.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
'Test setup error: Second turn is not a valid text part.',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn2.parts[0].text).toBe('Successful response after empty');
|
|
});
|
|
it('should queue a subsequent sendMessageStream call until the first stream is fully consumed', async () => {
|
|
// 1. Create a promise to manually control the stream's lifecycle
|
|
let continueFirstStream: () => void;
|
|
const firstStreamContinuePromise = new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
|
|
continueFirstStream = resolve;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// 2. Mock the API to return controllable async generators
|
|
const firstStreamGenerator = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{ content: { parts: [{ text: 'first response part 1' }] } },
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
await firstStreamContinuePromise; // Pause the stream
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: ' part 2' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
const secondStreamGenerator = (async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'second response' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})();
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(firstStreamGenerator)
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(secondStreamGenerator);
|
|
|
|
// 3. Start the first stream and consume only the first chunk to pause it
|
|
const firstStream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'first' },
|
|
'prompt-1',
|
|
);
|
|
const firstStreamIterator = firstStream[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
|
|
await firstStreamIterator.next();
|
|
|
|
// 4. While the first stream is paused, start the second call. It will block.
|
|
const secondStreamPromise = chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'second' },
|
|
'prompt-2',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// 5. Assert that only one API call has been made so far.
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
|
|
// 6. Unblock and fully consume the first stream to completion.
|
|
continueFirstStream!();
|
|
await firstStreamIterator.next(); // Consume the rest of the stream
|
|
await firstStreamIterator.next(); // Finish the iterator
|
|
|
|
// 7. Now that the first stream is done, await the second promise to get its generator.
|
|
const secondStream = await secondStreamPromise;
|
|
|
|
// 8. Start consuming the second stream, which triggers its internal API call.
|
|
const secondStreamIterator = secondStream[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
|
|
await secondStreamIterator.next();
|
|
|
|
// 9. The second API call should now have been made.
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
|
|
// 10. FIX: Fully consume the second stream to ensure recordHistory is called.
|
|
await secondStreamIterator.next(); // This finishes the iterator.
|
|
|
|
// 11. Final check on history.
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(4);
|
|
|
|
const turn4 = history[3];
|
|
if (!turn4?.parts?.[0] || !('text' in turn4.parts[0])) {
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
'Test setup error: Fourth turn is not a valid text part.',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
expect(turn4.parts[0].text).toBe('second response');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Model Resolution', () => {
|
|
const mockResponse = {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'response' }], role: 'model' },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
|
|
it('should use the FLASH model when in fallback mode (sendMessageStream)', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(mockConfig.getModel).mockReturnValue('gemini-pro');
|
|
vi.mocked(mockConfig.isInFallbackMode).mockReturnValue(true);
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockImplementation(
|
|
async () =>
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield mockResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test' },
|
|
'prompt-id-res3',
|
|
);
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// consume stream
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
model: DEFAULT_GEMINI_FLASH_MODEL,
|
|
}),
|
|
'prompt-id-res3',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Fallback Integration (Retries)', () => {
|
|
const error429 = Object.assign(new Error('API Error 429: Quota exceeded'), {
|
|
status: 429,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Define the simulated behavior for retryWithBackoff for these tests.
|
|
// This simulation tries the apiCall, if it fails, it calls the callback,
|
|
// and then tries the apiCall again if the callback returns true.
|
|
const simulateRetryBehavior = async <T>(
|
|
apiCall: () => Promise<T>,
|
|
options: Partial<RetryOptions>,
|
|
) => {
|
|
try {
|
|
return await apiCall();
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
if (options.onPersistent429) {
|
|
// We simulate the "persistent" trigger here for simplicity.
|
|
const shouldRetry = await options.onPersistent429(
|
|
options.authType,
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
if (shouldRetry) {
|
|
return await apiCall();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
throw error; // Stop if callback returns false/null or doesn't exist
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockRetryWithBackoff.mockImplementation(simulateRetryBehavior);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
mockRetryWithBackoff.mockImplementation(async (apiCall) => apiCall());
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should call handleFallback with the specific failed model and retry if handler returns true', async () => {
|
|
const authType = AuthType.LOGIN_WITH_GOOGLE;
|
|
vi.mocked(mockConfig.getContentGeneratorConfig).mockReturnValue({
|
|
authType,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const isInFallbackModeSpy = vi.spyOn(mockConfig, 'isInFallbackMode');
|
|
isInFallbackModeSpy.mockReturnValue(false);
|
|
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockRejectedValueOnce(error429) // Attempt 1 fails
|
|
.mockResolvedValueOnce(
|
|
// Attempt 2 succeeds
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: { parts: [{ text: 'Success on retry' }] },
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mockHandleFallback.mockImplementation(async () => {
|
|
isInFallbackModeSpy.mockReturnValue(true);
|
|
return true; // Signal retry
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'trigger 429' },
|
|
'prompt-id-fb1',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Consume stream to trigger logic
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
// no-op
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
|
|
2,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(mockHandleFallback).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
expect(mockHandleFallback).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
mockConfig,
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
authType,
|
|
error429,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
expect(modelTurn.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Success on retry');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should stop retrying if handleFallback returns false (e.g., auth intent)', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(mockConfig.getModel).mockReturnValue('gemini-pro');
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).mockRejectedValue(
|
|
error429,
|
|
);
|
|
mockHandleFallback.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test stop' },
|
|
'prompt-id-fb2',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
(async () => {
|
|
for await (const _ of stream) {
|
|
/* consume stream */
|
|
}
|
|
})(),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(error429);
|
|
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(
|
|
1,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(mockHandleFallback).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should discard valid partial content from a failed attempt upon retry', async () => {
|
|
// Mock the stream to fail on the first attempt after yielding some valid content.
|
|
vi.mocked(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// First attempt: yields one valid chunk, then one invalid chunk
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'This valid part should be discarded' }],
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [{ content: { parts: [{ text: '' }] } }], // Invalid chunk triggers retry
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () =>
|
|
// Second attempt (the retry): succeeds
|
|
(async function* () {
|
|
yield {
|
|
candidates: [
|
|
{
|
|
content: {
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'Successful final response' }],
|
|
},
|
|
finishReason: 'STOP',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as unknown as GenerateContentResponse;
|
|
})(),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Send a message and consume the stream
|
|
const stream = await chat.sendMessageStream(
|
|
'test-model',
|
|
{ message: 'test' },
|
|
'prompt-id-discard-test',
|
|
);
|
|
const events: StreamEvent[] = [];
|
|
for await (const event of stream) {
|
|
events.push(event);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that a retry happened
|
|
expect(mockContentGenerator.generateContentStream).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
expect(events.some((e) => e.type === StreamEventType.RETRY)).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// Check the final recorded history
|
|
const history = chat.getHistory();
|
|
expect(history.length).toBe(2); // user turn + final model turn
|
|
|
|
const modelTurn = history[1]!;
|
|
// The model turn should only contain the text from the successful attempt
|
|
expect(modelTurn!.parts![0]!.text).toBe('Successful final response');
|
|
// It should NOT contain any text from the failed attempt
|
|
expect(modelTurn!.parts![0]!.text).not.toContain(
|
|
'This valid part should be discarded',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('stripThoughtsFromHistory', () => {
|
|
it('should strip thought signatures', () => {
|
|
chat.setHistory([
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'hello' }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [
|
|
{ text: 'thinking...', thoughtSignature: 'thought-123' },
|
|
{
|
|
functionCall: { name: 'test', args: {} },
|
|
thoughtSignature: 'thought-456',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
chat.stripThoughtsFromHistory();
|
|
|
|
expect(chat.getHistory()).toEqual([
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'user',
|
|
parts: [{ text: 'hello' }],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
role: 'model',
|
|
parts: [
|
|
{ text: 'thinking...' },
|
|
{ functionCall: { name: 'test', args: {} } },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|