This change refactors the bulk task update logic so that it updates all fields a single task update would update as well.
Could be improved in the future so that it is more efficient, instead of calling the update function repeatedly. Right now, this reduces the complexity by a lot and it should be fast enough for most cases using this.
Resolves#1452
This fixes a bug where tasks which were filtered out by their label would still be shown. That was caused by the way the filter query was translated to sql under the hood.
Resolves https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/394
This fixes a bug where a saved filter would contain many "dead" entries for tasks which are not part of that filter. These entries were "dead" because the filter would not match for them and thus they were not shown.
The problem was caused by a routine during the creation of the filter where all projects from all matching tasks would be used as input for fetching the tasks to add to task_positions.
https://community.vikunja.io/t/not-able-to-move-task-between-buckets-within-a-kanban-view-for-saved-filter/2882/3
Closes [#348](https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/348)
When moving a project, the old task bucket entries (project, saved
filters) will be removed, but not the corresponding position. This has
the effect that the saved_filter event hook UpdateTaskInSavedFilterViews
wrongly assumes that the task doesn't need to be re-added to the saved
filter since the position part still exists.
Reviewed-on: https://kolaente.dev/vikunja/vikunja/pulls/2840
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@mbosch.me>
Co-committed-by: Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@mbosch.me>
This change allows to specify the task index when creating a task, which will then be checked to avoid duplicates and used. This allows us to calculate the indexes for all tasks beforehand when creating them at once using quick add magic.
The method is not bulletproof, but already fixes a problem where multiple tasks would have the same index when created that way.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/add-multiple-tasks-at-once/333/16
Vikunja now uses one recursive CTE and a few optimizations to fetch all subscribers for a task or project. This makes the relevant code easier to maintain and more performant.
This fixes a bug where tasks which had their done status changed were not moved in the correct bucket. This affected both frontend and api. The move of the task between buckets is now correctly done in the api and frontend - with a bit of duplicated logic between the two. This could be optimized further in the future.
Resolves https://kolaente.dev/vikunja/vikunja/issues/2610
Before this fix, creating a project with Typesense enabled would fail with an error because the tasks it fetches as part of that process do not have the task position property in their index. We now fall back to using the db for searching in that case.
In the long run, we should use typesense joins for the task position to make this more efficient.
BREAKING CHANGE: The bucket id of the task model is now only used internally and will not trigger a change in buckets when updating the task.
This resolves a problem where the task update routine needs to know the view context it is in. Because that's not really what it should be used for, the extra endpoint takes all required parameters and handles the complexity of actually updating the bucket.
This fixes a bug where it was impossible to move a task around between buckets of a saved filter view. In that case, the view of the bucket and the project the task was in would be different, hence the update failed.
This change fixes a bug where Typesense would try to sort by the project view of a saved filter. The view position is not indexed in Typesense, hence filtering fails. Because sorting by position is not a feature in saved filters, I've removed the logic for sorting saved filters with Typesense.
