docs: note untracked files in review

This commit is contained in:
Aiden Cline
2026-01-18 13:22:39 -06:00
parent 38c641a2fc
commit c29d44fcef

View File

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Based on the input provided, determine which type of review to perform:
1. **No arguments (default)**: Review all uncommitted changes
- Run: `git diff` for unstaged changes
- Run: `git diff --cached` for staged changes
- Run: `git status --short` to identify untracked (net new) files
2. **Commit hash** (40-char SHA or short hash): Review that specific commit
- Run: `git show $ARGUMENTS`
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ Use best judgement when processing input.
**Diffs alone are not enough.** After getting the diff, read the entire file(s) being modified to understand the full context. Code that looks wrong in isolation may be correct given surrounding logic—and vice versa.
- Use the diff to identify which files changed
- Use `git status --short` to identify untracked files, then read their full contents
- Read the full file to understand existing patterns, control flow, and error handling
- Check for existing style guide or conventions files (CONVENTIONS.md, AGENTS.md, .editorconfig, etc.)